Games - Artwear - Wisdom Wall Art - Stationery - Homeschooling - Don't Tread On Me - Income Tax Truth - Comment - Home |
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nineteen
The refunds reflected in the following checks and notices include EVERYTHING-- Social Security 'contributions' and all-- which was withheld from the private-sector earnings of these upstanding Americans during the relevant years, unless otherwise indicated. These good folks learned the truth, and then simply, and courageously, insisted on lawful behavior from their servant government.
Total retained or refunded so far:
(Actually, this is only the total of the checks and notices I have been sent for posting. Adding what has been merely reported to me would raise the figure a great deal; no doubt the actual overall total of what has been received by readers-- including those who have not shared the news-- is much higher still.)
Shimone Canty
|
See Shimone's 2005 Georgia victory here.
Johnny Waymire
|
The amount refunded here is incomplete, perhaps due to Johnny's FICA 'contributions' being mistakenly listed as "excess social security tax withheld" rather than simply added to other amounts withheld as "federal income tax withheld"... See the docs associated with this victory here.
Justin _
|
Nothing had been withheld from Justin's earnings, so this improperly collected "telephone tax" was the extent of his "overpayment"...
See Justin's 2005 federal victory here.
Craig Combs
|
Nothing had been withheld from Craig's earnings, so after rebutting a 1099 alleging that his earnings were "income" this improperly collected "telephone tax" was the extent of his "overpayment"...
Robert Hemstreet
|
Joseph Hossman
|
|
|
Anon.
 |
Click here to see Anon.'s 2006 federal victory
James Brower
 |
Andrew Lewis
 |
Pennsylvania argued with Andrew about this claim at first. Click here to see the state's dispute and Andrew's reply.
Andrew's 2006 federal victory can be seen here, and his 2006 Pittsburgh victory can be seen here.
Rob Anderson
 |
Brad _
 |
Brad's 2004 federal and Michigan victories can be seen here.
Dennis and Therese Banks
 |
David _
|
Enjoy Dave and his wife Tina's 2005 federal victory here.
William and Ellen Call
|
|
Tony and Bonnie Bowles
|
The "Total Payments" and "Amount of Overpaid Tax" listed on this composite of the notice Tony and Bonnie received are incorrect-- amounts had been withheld from them, although only under the FICA (Social Security and Medicare "contributions"). As the amounts to be withheld under that program are measured by the receipt of "wages"-- which this form acknowledges Tony and Bonnie had none of-- this represents a "victory in progress" of the sort discussed here.
Chris and Shelly Reile
 |
See Chris and Shelly's previous victories here.
Michael Poitras
 |
Click here to see the docs associated with this victory.
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page One
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Two
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Three
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Four
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Five
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Six
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seven
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eight
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nine
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Ten
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eleven
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twelve
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Thirteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fourteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fifteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Sixteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seventeen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eighteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twenty
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyOne
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyTwo
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyThree
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFour
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFive
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentySix
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentySeven
Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog is still trying to play its losing hand in a few cases-- particularly where amended returns, in which the filer necessarily disputes his or her own previous testimony, are concerned. Significantly, not once in any of these efforts to discourage or stonewall a proper filing does the government actually challenge or dispute the accuracy of what is revealed in 'Cracking the Code-...'
Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption. Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all.
“God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”
-Daniel Webster
NOTE: Whether any given individual is entitled to a refund depends on a number of different factors, and no one should presume that they are so entitled simply because they see that others are. Each person should educate himself or herself about the particulars of the law, and make his or her own determination in this regard.
To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.
An "Income" Tax Subject Site Map
A Few Words About Tax "Reform"
Use the "Back" button on your browser to return to the previous page
NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned.
When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.
