More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twenty-Three
Tens of thousands of readers of 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America' have taken control of their own resources, in accordance with, and respect for, the law. The likely total amount reclaimed by these good Americans so far is upward of several billion dollars.
A few of these good American men and women-- such as those honored below-- are generous enough to send me the evidence of their victories in upholding the law, for the edification and inspiration of everyone. At the moment those shared refund checks, closing notices, and so forth total:
After years of clinging to non-filing, which culminated in a sustained garnishment of more than $29,000.00 during 2006 for unrebutted alleged liabilities for the previous three years, CtC Warrior L. H. finally began acting on what she had learned about the law in CtC. L. filed returns for the past ten years in April of 2007 and promptly secured the victory above-- a complete refund for 2006, including every penny taken from her through garnishment during the year.
Although L. will likely have a complicated path ahead of her as the ramifications of her past issues and the processes already set in motion in regard to those issues prior to her belated responses play out, she has now secured her legal ground and taken her proper place in the driver's seat.
Click here to see the docs associated with this victory.
Ah, well. Richard waited too long on this one. But not these others:
Click here to see the filing, the IRS attempt to disregard it and extract more than $43,000.00, and the response leading to the notice above.
Enjoy S.'s 2004 Lancaster, Pennsylvania victory here.
Conrad & Royce Kritzberger
Click here to see Jane's 2005 federal and Louisiana victories
Virgil and Barbara _
See Virgil and Barbara's 2006 Kansas victory here.
Dan learned the truth after already having filed, and recovered his property by amending his original return
Click here to see the docs associated with this federal refund for 2006, including an IRS notice that it had been subjected to special scrutiny prior to issuance.
Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog is still trying to play its losing hand in a few cases-- particularly where amended returns, in which the filer necessarily disputes his or her own previous testimony, are concerned. Significantly, not once in any of these efforts to discourage or stonewall a proper filing does the government actually challenge or dispute the accuracy of what is revealed in 'Cracking the Code-...'
Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption. Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all.
“God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”
NOTE: Whether any given individual is entitled to a refund depends on a number of different factors, and no one should presume that they are so entitled simply because they see that others are. Each person should educate himself or herself about the particulars of the law, and make his or her own determination in this regard.
To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.
See what readers have to say about 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America'
The First Complete "Income" Tax-Related Refund (Social Security, Medicare And All) Ever Received
An "Income" Tax Subject Site Map
A Few Words About Tax "Reform"
Click Here to Crack the Code
NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned.
When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.