Games - Artwear - Wisdom Wall Art - Stationery - HomeschoolingDon't Tread On Me - Income Tax Truth - Comment - Home

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twenty-Two

The refunds reflected in the following checks and notices include EVERYTHING-- Social Security 'contributions' and all-- which was withheld from the private-sector earnings of these upstanding Americans during the relevant years, unless otherwise indicated.  These good folks learned the truth, and then simply, and courageously, insisted on lawful behavior from their servant government.

Total retained or refunded so far:

(Actually, this is only the total of the checks and notices I have been sent for posting.  Adding what has been merely reported to me would raise the figure a great deal; no doubt the actual overall total of what has been received by readers-- including those who have not shared the news-- is much higher still.)

 

S. B.

 

 

(This is for 2006)

 


 

Virgil and Barbara _

 

(2006)

 

See Virgil and Barbara's 2006 Missouri victory here.

 


 

Alisha Ritz

 

Who received this (after having already filing an amended return regarding this year):

 

 

...responded with a demand that her return be processed and for proof of assessment by way of this,

 

...resulting in this:

 

 

this (which Alisha is now engaged in disputing):

 

 

and this:

 

 

***

On a separate front, Alisha also secured THIS victory this summer:

 

 

This puts me in mind of those get-the-school-year-rolling writing assignments we all remember so fondly (or not): "Write two pages on what you did during summer vacation."  Alisha's (like that of all CtC Warriors) would start out with, "I spent the summer upholding the rule of law..."

 

It wasn't just a summer project, though:

 

 


D. _

 

 

Click here to see the docs filed to secure this victory.

 

Click here to see D.'s 2004 federal victory.

 


 

Scott Holmes

 

 


 

Bill and Nancy Johnston

 

 

Click here to see Bill and Nancy's 2003 refund story.

 


 

Marc and Mary Cappello

 

 

See Marc and Mary's 2006 Louisiana victory here; and their 2002 and 2003 Louisiana victories and 2005 federal victory here.

 


 

John March

 

 

 

(This diversion is for an alleged 2005 federal liability which is in dispute.)

 


 

Richard Hart

 

 

Richard's 2002, 2003, 2004 and 2005 federal victories can be enjoyed here.

 


 

Joseph C.

 

 

This latest victory for Joseph met with a little resistance at first.  Get the details here.

 

Enjoy Joseph's 2005 Illinois victory here, and his federal victories for 2005 and 2006 here and here.

 


 

Ray Hammond

 

 


 

Stephen _

 

 


 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page One

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Two

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Three

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Four

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Five

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Six

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eight

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nine

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Ten

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eleven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twelve

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Thirteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fourteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fifteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Sixteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seventeen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eighteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nineteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twenty

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyOne

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyThree

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFour

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFive

 

Victory Highlights

 


 

Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog is still trying to play its losing hand in a few cases-- particularly where amended returns, in which the filer necessarily disputes his or her own previous testimony, are concerned.  Significantly, not once in any of these efforts to discourage or stonewall a proper filing does the government actually challenge or dispute the accuracy of what is revealed in 'Cracking the Code-...'

 

Click here for more...

 


 

Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption.  Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all.  

 

“God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”

-Daniel Webster

 

NOTE: Whether any given individual is entitled to a refund depends on a number of different factors, and no one should presume that they are so entitled simply because they see that others are.  Each person should educate himself or herself about the particulars of the law, and make his or her own determination in this regard.

 

To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.

 

See what readers have to say about 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America'

Pete's 2003 refund page

An "Income" Tax Subject Site Map

A Few Words About Tax "Reform"

Click Here to Crack the Code

Use the "Back" button on your browser to return to the previous page

NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned. 

When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.