(Click on the underlined text to jump to each feature. To
return, use your browser's "back" button or the provided "Return to
Contents" links. Please keep in mind that
many more items of interest are to be found between featured
articles, so your most profitable course is to scroll through the
whole page...)
Since the Swamp isn't able to discipline itself voluntarily in accordance with George
Washington's wisdom,
April 22- In 1509, Henry VIII takes the
throne of England. In 1898, the United States Navy initiates a blockade of
Cuban ports in an opening move of the Spanish-American War. In 1912, Pravda
begins publication in St. Petersburg, Russia. In 2000, federal agents seize
six-year-old Cuban refugee Elian Gonzalez from his relatives in Miami in order
to return him to the island prison.
Anniversaries of interest for
each day of this week will be found throughout the newsletter
below.
Please don't just
read what I post here (or anywhere), and nod your head sagely or
approvingly and then move on to other things. I don't post in order
to affirm your sense of things. I post in order to equip you with
perspectives and arguments with which to
educate others, and in the
expectation that you will forward my posts to other people (or
direct them to those posts). PLEASE do those things,
especially in recognition of the fact
that my posts are heavily suppressed. They will NOT get out
if you don't get them out.
Remember, we won't win by only YOU knowing what I
present. We will win by LOTS OF OTHERS knowing what I present.
***
BTW, join me on The Shields Report
the first Saturday of every month at 5PM EDT!!
...embodying some key Constitutional
provisions and the time-tested and well-proven
wisdom of America's Founding Father.
WHEREAS, THE UNITED STATES
CONSTITUTION PROVIDES, at Article 1, sec. 2, cl.
2 and sec. 3, cl. 3, and Article 2, sec. 1, cl.
5 that only American citizens shall hold elected
offices in the United States government; and,
Pursuant to the clear language and
obvious intent of fundamental US law as cited
above, no person who can be shown to harbor an
interest in the well-being of any other country
or people, either benevolent or hostile, and
either personally or as a proxy for others,
whether in response to blackmail or bribery or
for any reason whatsoever,
shall be permitted to hold elected or appointed
office in the United States.
Upon a sworn allegation of any
officeholder's compromised interests as outlined
above supported by any additional credible
evidence, the United States House of
Representatives shall assemble the evidence for
presentation in trial and forward articles of
impeachment against such person to the United
States Senate, which shall promptly convene a
trial for the hearing of the evidence and the
rendering of a decision. No showing of action
against America's interests shall be required
for either charging or conviction.
(I characterize this as a new law here,
but perhaps it would be necessary to enact it as a
Constitutional amendment, since the current crop of
deeply-compromised office-holders are unlikely to
enact it as mere legislation. In this case the text
would consist only of what follows the first comma
in paragraph 3:
No person who can be shown to
harbor an interest in the well-being of any
other country or people, either benevolent or
hostile, and either personally or as a proxy for
others, whether in response to blackmail or
bribery or for any reason whatsoever,
shall be permitted to hold elected or appointed
office in the United States.
Upon a sworn allegation of any
officeholder's compromised interests as outlined
above supported by any additional credible
evidence, the United States House of
Representatives shall assemble the evidence for
presentation in trial and forward articles of
impeachment against such person to the United
States Senate, which shall promptly convene a
trial for the hearing of the evidence and the
rendering of a decision. No showing of action
against America's interests shall be required
for either charging or conviction.)
***
I'M SORRY TO SAY IT, but even
many of the supposedly conservative and law-respecting
"right" in America have become censorship enthusiasts in
service to an Israeli agenda (and in likewise
corrupt and hypocritical service to Ukrainian
interests-- whether directly or as an expression of
festering hostility to Russia). It's time the adults
in the room step up and forcibly kick all the
compromised foreign-policy
nutcases to the curb, and really and
meaningfully put us back on the path to America
first.
The hands of those in thrall to
affections or hostilities to other countries or
peoples have no business on any levers of power
here. Now and then American interests
might align with favoring one place or group, or
disfavoring another place or group, but those calls
should never be made by people predisposed in such
matters-- enslaved in such matters, in fact, as
George Washington put it in his deeply wise and
prescient Farewell Address.
As it happens, when Israel was engaged
in one of its prior suppression exercises in Gaza
back in April of 2018, I was moved to bring
Washington's thoughtful words to the attention of
the CtC community (in hopes that members would help
spread them further). What I said then is, if
anything, even more important today than it was back
then, and so, here it is again (updated with some
additions concerning Ukraine, which was not, back
then, the festering boil of exactly what Washington
warns us against, as it surely is now...):
A Word To America's Policy
Makers From The Father Of Our Country
There's never been a better time for
revisiting this wisdom.
ON SEPTEMBER 19, 1796, George
Washington's
farewell address was published as an open letter
to the American public. Among much other wisdom, the
man so universally respected by the Founders as to
have been unanimously elected president of the
convention that drafted our current United States
Constitution made the following observations
regarding prudent, productive, and
liberty-protective foreign policy:
"...[N]othing is more essential,
than that permanent, inveterate antipathies against
particular Nations, and passionate attachments for
others, should be excluded; and that, in place of
them, just and amicable feelings towards all should
be cultivated. The Nation, which indulges towards
another an habitual hatred, or an habitual fondness,
is in some degree a slave. It is a slave to its
animosity or to its affection, either of which is
sufficient to lead it astray from its duty and its
interest. Antipathy in one nation against another
disposes each more readily to offer insult and
injury, to lay hold of slight causes of umbrage, and
to be haughty and intractable, when accidental or
trifling occasions of dispute occur. Hence frequent
collisions, obstinate, envenomed, and bloody
contests. The Nation, prompted by ill-will and
resentment, sometimes impels to war the Government,
contrary to the best calculations of policy. The
Government sometimes participates in the national
propensity, and adopts through passion what reason
would reject; at other times, it makes the animosity
of the nation subservient to projects of hostility
instigated by pride, ambition, and other sinister
and pernicious motives. The peace often, sometimes
perhaps the liberty, of Nations has been the victim.
"So likewise, a passionate
attachment of one Nation for another produces a
variety of evils. Sympathy for the favorite Nation,
facilitating the illusion of an imaginary common
interest, in cases where no real common interest
exists, and infusing into one the enmities of the
other, betrays the former into a participation in
the quarrels and wars of the latter, without
adequate inducement or justification. It leads also
to concessions to the favorite Nation of privileges
denied to others, which is apt doubly to injure the
Nation making the concessions; by unnecessarily
parting with what ought to have been retained; and
by exciting jealousy, ill-will, and a disposition to
retaliate, in the parties from whom equal privileges
are withheld. And it gives to ambitious, corrupted,
or deluded citizens, (who devote themselves to the
favorite nation,) facility to betray or sacrifice
the interests of their own country, without odium,
sometimes even with popularity; gilding, with the
appearances of a virtuous sense of obligation, a
commendable deference for public opinion, or a
laudable zeal for public good, the base or foolish
compliances of ambition, corruption, or
infatuation."
WHAT DOES THIS SAY TO US (and
especially to current denizens of Washington, DC)?
Here's what:
Sh*t-can
the bad attitude toward Russia and Iran, dammit, and
fire anyone who harbors it!
Russia is a country whose people
heroically threw off a deeply-embedded vicious
totalitarian state not long ago (maybe this is why
some folks hate it so much?). It is properly secular
and tolerant of all faiths (while being more
Christian than the USA has been for decades), has
far lower taxes than those imposed by the United
States and a much more lasseiz-faire regulatory
demeanor, and has been doing everything possible to
be a good neighbor to the rest of the world for
many, many years. The United States should be doing
everything possible to be its friend.
Iran, though a theocracy, is
religiously and ethnically open (for example,
Christianity is the fastest-growing religion in Iran
right now; Sunnis Muslims live there alongside the
Shi'ite majority; and Jews are a protected religious
minority with expressly-reserved seats in
Parliament). It has a long history of
non-aggression, and has been relentlessly and
viciously victimized by the United States over the
last 65 years. We owe it our good behavior.
Sh*t-can
the creepy mooning over Britain, Israel, Saudi
Arabia and Ukraine, dammit, and fire anyone
afflicted by it!
Britain for many years now has been a
political and cultural embarrassment to Western
civilization, and even before that had a long
history of deception as a routine tool of
"statecraft", lawless "might makes right" military
aggressions, and basic unscrupulousness in regard to
the rest of the world.
Israel and Saudi Arabia are apartheid-esque
theocracies which have succeeded in establishing
"Master-Blaster" relationships with the United
States (with them in the "master" seat) by buying
influence in Washington (often
with money taken from Americans). Israel is
aggressively, disruptively and unscrupulously
expansionist; Saudi Arabia is the source of
Wahabbist Islamic radicalism.
Both are responsible for endless
Middle-East conflicts and abuses of poorly-defended
victims; both have been eating meals taken from the
tables of American citizens for decades; and both
should be kept at arm's length rather than hugged so
closely that we get their fleas.
Ukraine is a relatively new barnacle on
the American ship of state, but
is no
more deserving of affectionate attachment than
the rest while bringing into the picture a greater
physical risk to our country and people than any of
the others.
LET'S REMEMBER Washington's wisdom: NO
OTHER COUNTRY'S INTERESTS ARE WORTH ONE DROP OF
AMERICAN BLOOD, OR ONE DOLLAR OF AMERICAN TREASURE.
Their enemies are NOT our enemies, and
their friends are NOT our friends, and this can't be
evaded by any pretenses about "strategic"
considerations.
America First, and that means not
swaggering around the world creating pretexts for
pissing away American treasure through hostile
posturing-- or outright aggression-- against people
who haven't invaded our shores.
Listen to Father George.
AND HERE'S MY WORD TO EVERYONE ELSE:
Stop leaving critical calls like these up to
political hacks. How has that ever worked for you in
the past?
Use the tools the Founders provided for
us all, as discussed
here.
Take seriously Saruman's question:
***
Now, do you want this
article to make a difference? It only will
do so if YOU PASS IT ON TO OTHERS.
Please do that.
Use the permalink address
given above or below to post on social media. Or use the
"e-mail this article" link to send it to
someone else by that method.
It's Also Time To Demand The
Courts Show Respect For The Fourth Amendment
...as Congress and the Executive prove
yet again that they will not do so.
AMONG MANY OTHER OFFENSES in his short
time as Speaker of the House, Mike Johnson (with
many accomplices) took pains recently to spit on the
US Constitution and not only enable the continuation
of systematic government violations of the Fourth
Amendment, but to worsen them. The Senate followed
suit, and Joe Biden will gleefully cannonball into
that pool as well.
I speak, of course, of the renewal of
Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance
Act (FISA). That's the provision that purports to
authorize warrantless searches and seizures-- by
magic, it would seem, since the government is
Constitutionally prohibited from conducting such
searches and seizures, and therefore Congress cannot
authorize any part of it to conduct them.
The effort to work around the
prohibition has prompted the invention of such
nonsense doctrines as the "reasonable expectation of
privacy" whereby it is "reasoned" that because you
are willing to have your phone and internet service
providers know certain things
about your affairs (as necessary to take advantage
of the services they offer) that you are thus
implicitly giving permission for the government to
know those things, too (or for ANYONE to know them,
for that matter, making one wonder why there is
always a hue and cry whenever any institution
suffers a data breach revealing stuff about which no one
supposedly has an expectation of privacy).
Similarly, it is doctrinally assumed
that when you leave the confines of your house, you
are also waiving your right to be secure in your
person, house, papers and effects against
unreasonable searches and seizures. The argument is
that by stepping outside it you somehow make it
reasonable for the state to surveil you without
probable cause or the protection of judicial
supervision.
After all, you're visible, aren't you?
So, if the neighbors can watch your every move, the
government should be able to do so, too, right? But
these false doctrines are attempting to turn the
Fourth Amendment on its head.
The Fourth Amendment doesn't create or
even define or articulate a right for you. Rather,
it just acknowledges your right to privacy while
doing its real business, which is imposing a
prohibition on the government.
Key to enforcement of that "right" and
that prohibition is accuracy regarding the words
used in the law (the amendment). Here, it is the
true meaning of "reasonable" (or, more precisely,
"unreasonable") that is being misunderstood or
misconstrued by the courts, thus opening the door
for the evils of Section 702 (and FISA itself).
Here is that true meaning:
Warrantless Searches Are Always
Unlawful
The historical record of the Fourth
Amendment makes clear that there are no exceptions.
AMERICANS HAVE BEEN SIMMERING WITH
ANGER IN RECENT YEARS over revelations about the NSA
and FBI hoovering-up everyone's phone-calls, email,
"social media" posts and so on, along with other
systematic, institutionalized privacy assaults. This
widespread ire has been met with predictable
political-class nonsense: lies about the extent of
the violations, efforts to downplay the significance
of the violations, and arguments that it's all for a
good cause anyway, so everyone should just get over
it.
All of these evasions and obfuscations
are bad enough, just for the insult thereby offered
to an angry America: "We're not only mugging you,
but we also believe you're too stupid to stay
incensed about it if we throw some eyewash your
way..."
But the apologias and efforts to
placate us aren't the worst offenses. Far more
pernicious is the real assault on our
sensibilities and the frayed sinews of our
Constitutional structure in the form of repeated
assertions by the perps that these privacy
violations are "lawful".
They are not.
There
is no such thing as an unwarranted but "reasonable"
search
THE RATIONALE FOR ASSERTING THE
"LAWFULNESS" of warrantless extra-domicile and
electronic searches and seizures [of physical
property and data] has rested on construing the
Fourth Amendment as allowing for "reasonable"
searches and seizures without the need for warrants.
But this is a construction for the purpose of
distorting the amendment's prescriptions and
proscriptions-- a "constortion", if I may be allowed
to coin a term.
Under the constortion, the word
"unreasonable" in the amendment is read as isolated
from the remainder of the amendment, or as a
qualifier of the warrant specifications that follow.
Under the constortion, "unreasonable" is seen as
included in order to distinguish an imagined
"reasonable" search-- which, because "reasonable",
needs no warrant-- from an "unreasonable" search,
which, because unreasonable, does need a
warrant.
But in fact, the historical record
makes clear that this is in no way the Framers'
intent-- rather, "unreasonable" appears in the
amendment solely as an expression of the Framers'
view that ANY search or seizure unauthorized by a
warrant secured under stringent standards of
testimony and cause is thereby inherently
UN-reasonable, and a violation of the amendment.
In the amendment, "unreasonable" means
"without reason" (an illuminating synonym of which
is "unwarranted"). What follows after that term is
not a proscription for how "unreasonable" searches
or seizures are to be conducted. Instead, what
follows are the requirements for the establishment
of an amendment-satisfying reason for a search or
seizure.
FRANKLY, THE LANGUAGE OF THE AMENDMENT
ALONE makes its real meaning plain enough to anyone
reading it fairly, and without a wish to constort in
service to a government desire to be let off its
Constitutional chain. We'll go to the historical
original-intent records in a moment, but first,
let's just look at that current language:
The right of the people to be secure
in their persons, houses, papers, and effects,
against unreasonable searches and seizures, shall
not be violated, and no Warrants shall issue, but
upon probable cause, supported by Oath or
affirmation, and particularly describing the place
to be searched, and the persons or things to be
seized.
Fairly read without an intent to
misunderstand, there is no way this language can be
honestly construed as a Constitutional statement (or
even mere implication) that certain searches and
seizures can be lawfully conducted without warrants.
On the contrary, this language plainly says that
right of the people to be secure against searches
and seizures without a valid reason shall not be
violated, and establishment of a valid reason
requires an allegation of probable cause under oath,
with particularity, considered by an appropriate
officer authorized to issue warrants.
That is, "unreasonable" in the
amendment doesn't mean "out of the ordinary",
"excessive" or "in violation of reasonable
expectations of privacy" as federal courts have
variously constorted the amendment over recent
decades. Rather, "unreasonable" means just what is
says: "conducted without a properly-established
reason," and is followed by the requirements by
which a valid reason must be established.
However, my perceptions and arguments
of the proper reading of the amendment's language
needn't be relied upon to make my case. The writings
the Founders and Framers provide all the
clarification needed against even the most willfully
obtuse reading.
The
historical records are clear and definitive
LETS LOOK AT THE LANGUAGE of some
contemporaneous alternative versions of the Fourth
Amendment. Keep in mind that these measures reflect
the fact that at the time it was understood that
some kind of warrant was required for any search or
seizure, which was why the colonial-era British went
to the trouble of issuing "general warrants" even
when intending to conduct searches unsupported by
sworn allegations and particularity.
Here, as a first example, is the Fourth
Amendment counterpart from the Declaration of Rights
in the Pennsylvania Constitution of 1776:
That the people have a right to hold
themselves, their houses, papers, and possessions
free from search and seizure, and therefore warrants
without oaths or affirmations first made, affording
a sufficient foundation for them, and whereby any
officer or messenger may be commanded or required to
search suspected places, or to seize any person or
persons, his or their property, not particularly
described, are contrary to that right, and ought not
to be granted.
Consolidated, this reads: "[T]he people
have a right to be free from search and seizure [of
any kind-- houses, papers and possessions, with no
limiting specifications provided], and therefore
warrants [again, the only mechanism recognized at
the time by which any kind of search was
permitted] ought not be granted without sworn
allegations providing a sufficient foundation, and
without particularity."
Similarly, the Virginia Declaration of
Rights, another early version of the Fourth upon
which the federal Constitutional amendment was
modeled, reads in pertinent part:
That general warrants, whereby any
officer or messenger may be commanded to search
suspected places without evidence of a fact
committed, or to seize any person or persons not
named, or whose offence is not particularly
described and supported by evidence, are grievous
and oppressive, and ought not to be granted.
That is, "[S]earch[es]...without
evidence [which is to say, testimony, which is to
say, sworn]...are grievous and oppressive, and ought
not be granted."
Both of these contemporaneous
alternative versions of the Fourth Amendment plainly
declare that searches and seizures without sworn
allegations and particularity are unreasonable and
prohibited. In fact, the Pennsylvania version
expressly declares that any search and seizure
unsupported by sworn allegations of cause and/or
lacking particularity is
contrary to the right Constitutionally asserted and
secured therein.
James Madison, in arguing before
Congress for the inclusion of the Bill of Rights
(and, again, speaking in the context of ALL searches
and seizures requiring a warrant), described his
intent for the Fourth thusly:
The rights of the people to be
secured in their persons; their houses, their
papers, and their other property, from all
unreasonable searches and seizures, shall not be
violated by warrants issued without probable cause,
supported by oath or affirmation, or not
particularly describing the places to be searched,
or the persons or things to be seized.
Massachusetts, in its Constitution of
1780, put it this way:
Every subject has a right to be
secure from all unreasonable searches, and seizures
of his person, his houses, his papers, and all his
possessions. All warrants, therefore, are contrary
to this right, if the cause or foundation of them be
not previously supported by oath or affirmation; and
if the order in the warrant to a civil officer, to
make search in suspected places, or to arrest one or
more suspected persons, or to seize their property,
be not accompanied with a special designation of the
persons or objects of search, arrest, or seizure:
and no warrant ought to be issued but in cases, and
with the formalities, prescribed by the laws.
Plainly, the Framers adopted the Fourth
Amendment to ensure that all searches
conducted anywhere, at any time
and under any circumstances other than
arrest for conduct just committed are based on prior
establishment of probable cause by sworn testimony,
with particularity as to what is to be sought and
seized. There IS no "reasonable search" exception
that can be construed from the amendment.
The "unreasonable" in the Fourth's
language doesn't distinguish one kind of search
which needs a warrant from another kind that does
not. Instead, it serves to label all
non-conforming searches as thereby unreasonable and
thus barred by the amendment.
The
law hasn't changed, and modern unwarranted searches
are illegal
WHAT WAS UNCONSTUTIONAL YESTERDAY is
unconstitutional today, absent an intervening
amendment. Searches or seizures of any kind--
anyplace, anytime and of anything-- without a
warrant based on a sworn, credible and specific
allegation that evidence of a crime will be found
are Fourth Amendment violations. There are no
exceptions.
"An unconstitutional act is not law;
it confers no rights; it imposes no duties; it
affords no protection; it creates no office; it is
in legal contemplation, as inoperative as though it
had never passed."
-16 Am Jur 2d, Sec 177 late 2d, Sec
256
***
Now, seriously. Do you want this
article to make a difference? It only will
do so if YOU PASS IT ON TO OTHERS.
Please do that.
Use the permalink address
given above or below to post on social media. Or use the
"e-mail this article" link to send it to
someone else by that method.
Share these all, everywhere you can. Be your most
creative self in sending and "selling" these links. Do memes; make
gifs; respond to everything in the news that would be or have been
better had the state been small, or if Americans kept their money
for their own uses.
If you pay attention to the news and train yourself to
apply these perspectives, you will see a dozen things of which you
can make use in awakening other Americans to the virtues of having
the income tax correctly administered. Please, for my sake, for your
own sake, for the sake of your children and their future, make that
use.
IF YOU'RE NOT ALREADY GETTING THE NEWSLETTER delivered to your
email inbox, go to
this page
and subscribe to the group-- leave all options
in their default states.
YOU CAN ALSO usually find (and comment, share and repost) links to new
articles on GAB (click
here
to follow me and receive the announcement posts) and/or on X
(click here
to follow me and receive the announcement posts).
If you choose the social media option (or use it in
addition to other means, as I wish you would), PLEASE get the full value out of
them by diligently "sharing" or "reposting" my posts! That will
significantly improve their
visibility to others, and very much help the cause!!
My RSS feed:
(Members of the
state CtC Warrior forums
in AZ, CA, CO, FL, GA, IL, MI, MN, MO, NE, NY, NC, OH, OR, PA, SC,
TX, UT, VA, WA or WI, will continue to get the regular announcements
if the membership is set to receive email updates.)
NOTE: I will still not be engaging in
correspondence by
any of these alternative means-- those wishing to correspond with me should
continue to use direct email, as
specified here, for this purpose.
NOTE II: PLEASE help ensure that others in the
CtC community know about this change in newsletter delivery!!
*****
Not Letting This "Crisis" Go To Waste...
...an important action item opportunity.
FRIENDS, THE SPORADIC EASINGS of the despotic measures to
which most of the country has been subjected under
since the onset of the
COVID-19 hobgoblin narrative should not be
allowed to bleed off the head of steam you probably had been developing.
The offenses happened, and they're far from over. Stay hot.
And while you are all warmed up, and while others, if
they're smart, are just as hot, I'd like you to send an email (and
Facebook post, or whatever) with the following content to everyone you
can (with a request that they pass it along, in turn):
[Name], since March of 2020 you've
watched as over-fed state power has been used to literally destroy
classical Western civilization and impose a new despotic paradigm. No
dissent or debate permitted-- no permission or agreement sought.
YOU KNOW where this will end up if the arrogant
state power being used to make this happen isn't radically diminished in
size, influence, resources and popular support, and exposed as an
opportunistic exploiter of legal ignorance (an ignorance which it has
been nurturing in the average mind for decades).
Those things having not yet happened, you
should be quaking in your boots-- and you probably are.
Isn't it time-- and past time-- for you to
begin helping to make those desperately-needed defensive changes take
place? There is only one way these things can happen short of a
who-knows-what we'll-end-up-with explosion of violence. I'm going to
show it to you.
When you're done with that reading, you'll know
what to do next.
BTW, REMEMBER, ALSO, THAT EVERY AMERICAN has lately been given a stark lesson in the fact
that government officials at all levels will lie to you and violate the
law without batting an eye. They will do so any time it serves their agenda, and
you don't call them out for it.
If you know anyone who has been persisting in denial on the
truth about the income tax, you know such nonsense is usually be
grounded in some version or another of, "That can't be true..." or "They
would never do something like that...". Now's the time to put a pin in
that delusional bubble.
As the C19 hoax has starkly shown, "that" certainly CAN be true, and they
certainly WOULD do something
like that.
Use this evidence in all your
outreach efforts.
"It is not the function of our Government to keep the
citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the citizen to
keep the Government from falling into error."
-United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson
(Deceitful efforts to discourage Americans from
learning the truth about the "income tax")
FOR ALL THE YEARS SINCE 2003 when
CtC was first published, the government has engaged in a
concerted effort to frighten people away from its truths. This
effort involves official government websites and press releases
touting an occasional court ruling that appears to be at odds
with some
CtC-revelation (but without details sufficient to expose the
real substance of the ruling)--
and sometimes even more mendacious behavior.
Are the presentations and
resources offered on this site and in my other work of any value to you?
Tim Kendrick has posted
a video
on YouTube regarding donations. I didn't know what to do about
it to begin with; I don't do what I do intending for anyone to
feel obligated in any way.
But of course, no one IS obligated. I will continue
to make my work freely-available here, and in my books for only
the cost of a cheap paperback.
Thus, even though I post it here below, Tim's very
thoughtful personal resolution and encouragement to others is
just an invitation for consideration by those who may not be
conscious of the fact that I can't do what I do without support.
No one is to feel any pressure from it; if it moves anyone to
act let it be solely because it seems right.
All-in-all, just be the sort of person for others
that you would go to yourself for trustworthy leadership.
Leadership is a challenge. But it's not
complicated, and you can do it.
*****
Are You Having Trouble Spreading The
Word?
SKEPTICISM (SOMETIMES INVOKED BY FEAR) IS TO BE
EXPECTED when you're trying to explain to someone that
everything they've been encouraged their whole lives to
believe about something as entrenched and significant as the
income tax is basically nonsense. So here's a way to help
cut through the resistance:
Ask your listener how he or she would react if
you were to show an announcement from the Commissioner of
Internal Revenue admitting that the tax doesn't apply to the
earnings of most Americans and is misapplied most of the
time because people don't understand how it works? Or how
about if you showed a ruling from the Supreme Court saying
the same?
Now you just have to explain that
you're going to show exactly those things-- but because
the state really doesn't want people to know this, these
things haven't been said quite as forthrightly as we would
all wish. It's going to take a bit more work to take these
admissions in than is sufficient for just reading a press
release. But it'll be worth the effort...
IF YOU'RE NOT SPREADING THIS LINK with every bit of
energy you can, to school libraries, homeschool
families and community groups, your neighbors, your
family members, your pastors and
co-congregationalists, journalists, lawyers, CPAs,
members of congress, tax-agency workers, Wikipedia,
Anonymous, WikiLeaks, the Tax Foundation, everyone
in the "tax honesty" movement, the 9/11 truth
movement, other activist movements and everyone
else,
you have only yourself to blame for your
troubles with the tax, and a whole lot else of which
you might complain. It's on you.
WRITE A NICE, FRIENDLY AND BRIEF introductory note
explaining what will be seen at the link-- cryptic
is bad; excited is good-- and then send this WMI
(weapon of mass instruction) far and wide.
Remember: Real Americans don't accommodate fog, lies and a sliding scale of
adherence to the rule of law. Real American men and women stand up for the
truth and the law, come what may, knowing that it is only by setting the bar
at the top and enforcing it, come what may, that liberties are secured.
"Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be
strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be
highly rated."
-Thomas Paine
OUTREACH!!!
JOB ONE, PEOPLE!!! SPREAD. THE. WORD.
ONLY ONE THING WILL WIN YOU YOUR LIBERTY:
Spreading the truth. Accordingly, I've assembled
outreach resources into a new, dedicated page. Find it
here, and please, USE THESE TOOLS!! I can't
do this all by myself.
"In a time of
universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary
act."
In August 1961, during a
period when tensions between Washington and Moscow
were at a high point, Admiral Konstantin I.
Derevyanko penned a letter to Premier Krushchev. His
purpose was to alert Krushchev to what the Admiral
called the
“nuclear romanticism” of the Soviet General
Staff. The Admiral’s words still carry the force of
logic and common sense and are still worthy of our
attention today:
Which planet do these
people [the Soviet General Staff] intend to live on
in the future, and to which Earth do they plan to
send their troops to conquer territories?... By this
indiscriminately massive use of nuclear weapons on a
small and narrow area like Western Europe, we would
not only be accepting millions of radioactively
contaminated civilians, but, because of the
prevailing westerly winds, would also be
radioactively contaminating millions of our own
people for decades—our armed forces and the
populations of the socialist countries, including
our own country as far as the Urals.
According to an unnamed
official of the U.S. Government, President Joe Biden
has told Israel’s Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu
that the
United States will not participate in a
counterstrike against Iran. This is gratifying news.
Israel does not contemplate
operations against Iran or any other state that
challenges Israel’s bid for strategic dominance in
exclusively conventional military terms. In other
words, for Israel’s national leadership, the use of
a nuclear weapon is always on the table. Israel’s
fundamental deterrence is still asymmetric nuclear
capability.
Until now, Washington’s
unconditional support for any action Netanyahu wants
to take has
made Washington an accomplice in Israel’s
deliberate slaughter and starvation of Gaza’s Arab
population and in the Israeli attack on the Iranian
consulate in Syria, a violation of international
law. This collaborative support erodes the power and
authority of the American People.
It’s time to ask whether
American national interest and common sense are
finally intruding in the formulation and conduct of
U.S. foreign policy. No one in the United States,
Europe, or Asia benefits economically, politically,
or financially from a regional war in the Middle
East that closes the Straits of Hormuz and
potentially invites direct Russian military
intervention on Iran’s side. Is it also possible
that Biden might object to the destruction of life
in Gaza?
In this connection, the
revelation that Defense Secretary Lloyd Austin
allegedly asked Minister Yoav Gallant, his Israeli
counterpart, to inform the United States in advance
of any possible counterattack by Israel is small
comfort. Americans should not forget that Netanyahu
wields considerable influence on the Hill, and in
the mainstream media. Already
legislators are falling all over themselves to
send additional billions to Israel while U.S.
borders remain open, Americans die of fentanyl
poisoning, criminality rises, and children are being
trafficked.
It may be too soon to
answer the question of whether U.S. foreign policy
is changing. Why? Because Israeli Media reports that
there were intense debates during the last two
meetings of the Israeli war Cabinet on whether
to launch a large-scale strike against Iran. Such an
attack would likely target Iranian
command-and-control, potential long-range missile
sites, airbases, naval bases, and oil
infrastructure. On the other hand, there was
reportedly a discussion about an Israeli response
that might be more “measured” to prevent a wider
regional conflict.
What Americans know is that
Iran targeted Israeli military installations, not
Israel’s population. And Iran used a small fraction
of its arsenal and very few of their newest weapons.
Hezbollah effectively sat out the event.
Though it is speculated that two Israeli airfields
and possibly an intelligence station on the Golan
Heights sustained some damage, the entire Iranian
operation had
a theatrical air about it.
No one was surprised.
Certainly not the Israeli air forces or their
colleagues in the U.S. and British air forces. As
noted above, with few exceptions, most of the
300-plus drones and missiles were intercepted and
shot down.
Nevertheless, Iran
understood what was required to overwhelm Israeli
and allied air defenses. We may infer that there was
also a desire in Tehran to avoid escalating the
conflict. Consider what would happen if Iran
launched 1500 drones and 800 ballistic missiles over
several hours, or even days. Iran made its point.
It’s simple: Iran can destroy Israel. Tehran created
new conditions of deterrence that favor Iran.
Iran announced through
their UN mission that they consider the issue of the
Israeli strikes on their consular offices in Syria
closed. But nothing is solved. Little has changed. A
million are starving in Gaza, and Americans should
expect the
Israeli campaign of murder and expulsion in Gaza
to resume shortly.
COLONEL MACGREGOR POSES an important question, and the
sociopathic character of the Israeli state that has been revealed to the
world more starkly than ever before since the October 7, 2023 pretext
began being exploited to accomplish the long-sought eradication of the
remaining native population of Palestine suggests a very unwelcome
answer. Israel appears fully in gear right now with the "chosen people"
psycho-gimmick of a supposed divine mandate to do whatever it wants
without any sense of moral responsibility, and it is hard to imagine any
sudden awakening from that mania, and adoption of restraint.
On that latter point about the (grossly
irresponsible) idiots in Washington, and in light of
Colonel Macgregor's very valid concern about Israel
going nuclear, what the idiots REALLY should be
doing is impeaching Joe Biden for his refusal to
obey the law at 22 U.S.C. §§ 2799aa AND 2799aa-1.
Those provisions require presidential recognition of
Israel as a nuclear-weapons-possessing state not in
compliance with international law, and the
consequent cessation of all aid to that country.
UNFORTUNATELY, THE SWAMP CREATURES in
Washington won't themselves act to restrain rogue
states like Israel because they themselves operate a
rogue state, and wish to remain free to do so, as
well. They can't imagine pointing a finger at others
of their own ilk and issuing denunciations and
sanctions-- that would mean pointing a finger at
themselves, and embracing restraint, and this they
will not do.
Instead, that important task falls to
us. Here is how it can be accomplished:
The Founders' Defense
Against Sociopaths In Office
"In order to get power and retain it,
it is necessary to love power; but love of power is
not connected with goodness but with qualities that
are the opposite of goodness, such as pride, cunning
and cruelty."
-Leo Tolstoy
IT IS WELL ESTABLISHED that there are
an inordinate number of sociopaths in public office
as compared to the general population. As observed
by Martha Stout, clinical psychologist and author of
The Sociopath Next Door,
"[P]oliticians are more likely than
people in the general population to be sociopaths. I
think you would find no expert in the field of
sociopathy/psychopathy/antisocial personality
disorder who would dispute this..."
These sociopaths are people of the
"power sickness", characterized by narcissism,
self-importance,
a
willingness to manipulate others and the charm to do
it effectively, and a perpetual habit of deflecting
blame when their self-interested actions cause harm
to others, all stemming from a basic lack of
conscience. See
here,
here,
here and
here.
This overrepresentation of sociopaths
in the "political class" is no surprise. After all,
public office offers all the things gratifying to
such people. Office-holders get lots of attention
from others, much of it fawning; they get easy money
and lots of it; they get the opportunity to rule
over other people; and they face a standard of
success that relies more on a skill at bullsh*tting
than on the hard work needed to actually gratify the
needs and desires of strangers, such as is required
in any other occupation.
Further, the skills needed to achieve
public office-- being willing and able to
convincingly paint a rosier, more desirable picture
than any honest opponent would have the moral
turpitude to offer; charisma; and an obsession with
self-aggrandizement-- are all the natural traits of
the sociopath. Healthy men and women are
hard-pressed to compete against these political
"naturals" in any but the most extraordinary
circumstances.
Given this remarkably-aligned package
of requirements and rewards, it's no surprise that
sociopaths gravitate toward public office and
achieve it in numbers disproportionate to their
representation within the general population of
healthy men and women. The top prizes go to the very
worst of them, and the losers satisfy themselves by
joining the swarm of petty functionaries with
clipboards that fills government buildings
coast-to-coast.
SO, PUBLIC OFFICES ARE TYPICALLY nests
of snakes, supported by nests of lesser but
just-as-reptilian creatures, including, of course,
all the appointees selected by the chief sociopaths
(judges, department heads, commission members and so
forth), who are from the ranks of those congenial to
their benefactors' characters and desires. This has
always been the case, from the very beginning of any
kind of hierarchic ruling structure in any human
society.
And sociopaths in positions of
authority are dangerous! No one in his or her
right mind wants these folks wielding significant
power that is capable of causing harm on any kind of
mass scale, whether at home or abroad.
HAPPILY,
THOSE WHO FOUNDED THE FEDERAL GOVERNMENT IN AMERICA
knew all about sociopaths, their lusts, and their
skills. Adams, Jefferson, Madison and the rest were
close and accomplished students of history and
psychology, and had their own personal lifelong
experiences with public office-holders, both elected
and appointed. The Founders recognized the danger
these mentally-ill but eminently-functional types
represented to decent society and the principles of
liberty.
At the same time, the Founders also
recognized that some form of power-managing societal
organization was inevitable, whether theoretically
"necessary" or not. So, they made provisions to
structure that organization so as to provide for the
accommodation of the inevitable while strictly
protecting against the threat of sociopaths using
the structure to do great harm or to become an
existential threat to the liberty of the People.
EVEN AS ARDENT A STATIST as Abraham
Lincoln, in announcing his willingness to burn the Southern states to the ground in order to
keep them paying the tariff for the benefit of Northern interests in
his first inaugural address on March 4, 1861, paid at least lip
service to the Founders design of leaving control over the fuel
available to feed the fires Washington wants to light in the hands
of the individual citizenry when he said, "Doing this I deem to
be only a simple duty on my part; and I shall perform it, unless my
rightful masters, the American people, shall withhold the requisite
means..."
Lawyers:
It's Way Past Time For You All To Queue Up!
[Y]ou really need to familiarize yourself with Pete
Hendrickson's absolutely magnificent work at his website and in
his book(s). He has, brilliantly and lucidly, "cracked the
code" regarding the federal income EXCISE tax(es)."
-Mark C. Phillips, JD
"...I find your work fascinatingly simple to understand."
-Jerry Arnowitz, JD
"Your book is a masterpiece!"
-Michael Carver, JD
"Received your book yesterday. Started reading at 11
PM, finished at 4 AM." "I have 16 feet (literally 16'
4.5") of documents supporting just about everything in your
book." "Your book should be required reading for every lawyer
before being admitted to any Bar." "I hope you sell a
million of them."
-John O'Neil Green, JD
�Thanks again for your efforts, Pete. They mean an awful lot
to a lot of people.� ��as an attorney, I am humbled by your
knowledge and ability in navigating the law. THANK YOU for
your hard work and sacrifice.�
-Eric Smithers, JD
"I am an attorney and want to give a testimonial to your
book, which I find to be compelling. I am exercising these
rights for myself and my adult children. I'm even considering
making this my new avenue of law practice."
-Nancy "Ana" Garner, JD
Learn what these colleagues already know, then step forward and
become part of a coordinated, mutually-supportive squadron
focused on developing strategy and deploying the law in
courtrooms across the country. There's a lot of suing that
needs doing right now.
Are you ready for a challenge that'll put some real meaning
behind all the effort you went through to get your credentials?
Send me an email.
*****
Are You Ready For More Power?
"Peter Hendrickson has done it again! 'Upholding The
Law' does for individual liberties what 'Cracking the Code' did
for tax law compliance: exposes the reader to the unalienable
truth!"
-Jesse Herron, Bill Of Rights Press, Fort Collins, Colorado
Do you
know someone truly steeped in the Kool-Aid?
I mean
someone who finds it easier to believe that the far-better-educated,
far-more-suspicious-of-government Americans of a hundred years ago were
complete morons who granted authority to the state to take whatever it
wished from themselves and their posterity than to imagine that they
themselves simply misunderstand the true nature of the income tax? Even
while knowing that their beliefs about the tax are derived entirely from
the representations of those who profit from those beliefs (like tax
bureaucrats and "tax professionals")?
Do you
know someone like that? Shake them awake with the latest (sixteenth)
edition of
CtC!
If
CtC were actually
right, it would mean the government's been concealing and
denying and suppressing the truth for years
on end, and everybody knows THAT would never happen...
(Edward Snowden, come home! It was all just a bad dream; there really is
No Such Agency!)
Btw, a copy of
CtC from anywhere except the link above may not
be a current edition. CHECK. It matters. Also, there ARE no
e-book, Kindle or .pdf versions of
CtC.
Don't get taken in by efforts to sell you-- or even give you for
free-- any such thing.
April 23- In 1968, students protesting
the Viet Nam war take over the administration buildings at Columbia University.
In 1985, Coca-Cola changes to the "New Coke". The fit of madness passes within
a few months and use of the old formula is resumed. In 1988, Pink Floyd's 'Dark
Side of the Moon' is bumped from the Billboard 200 for the first time after 741
consecutive weeks on the chart. In 2018, an attacker wielding a van, not a gun,
kills 10 and wounds 16 in Toronto.
*****
A Few Words About "Climate Change" Fraud
You NEED to defend yourself and your kids against this
now-high-inertia effort to destroy liberty.
H/T to Jonesy for circulating this fun little meme and video link.
*****
Hey! If you're not getting the newsletter delivered
to your email inbox every Monday, go to
this link
and subscribe to the group-- leave all options in their default states.
April 24- In 1184 BC, the people of Troy are fooled by avarice
into being the means of their own undoing. Presented with a magnificent giant
wooden statue of a horse, the Trojans bring it within their city's walls. When
night falls, Greek warriors hidden within the statue slip out and open the gates
of their enemy's stronghold, allowing their fellows who waited outside to pour
in and conquer formerly impregnable Troy. In 1800, President John Adams signs
legislation appropriating $5,000 to establish a library of "such books as may be
necessary for the use of Congress". Now occupying three large buildings holding
well over 32 million books and counting-- none of which circulate to the public,
and the vast, vast majority of which never have been used by any Congressman and
never will be-- and with an annual budget of over $600 million and a staff of
more than 3,600, the Library of Congress is a fine example of a cancerous
federal boondoggle... In 1916, the phase of the Irish rebellion known as "The
Easter Risings" begins. In 1970, China puts its first satellite into orbit. In
1990, the Hubble Space telescope is launched into orbit; and Gruinard Island,
Scotland, the test site of weaponized anthrax by the British government during
World War II, is declared safe after 48 years of quarantine.
*****
A Two-Minute Review Of CtC
David Bindel reminds us that there's either the rule of law, or
there isn't.
HEY! SAYING IT AGAIN!! DON'T YOU WISH YOUR INSPIRING
BEING-THE-STORM VIDEO was posted? This is easy to do, and very important
(plus it can get you some great LHC swag!). See
(and carefully read)
these guidelines and encouragements.
Every victim of the "ignorance tax", 'cause it's all
just statist consent-engineering propaganda.
*****
Hey, Gamers!
WAKEN TO THE REAL-LIFE ADVENTURE IN WHICH YOU
ARE UNKNOWINGLY IMMERSED! Put down your controller and
listen!
You are surrounded by an actual battle between
villains, monsters and true heroes, all simply concealed
from you by
sophisticated spells which also keep you from
engaging in the fight.
There are real great deeds to be done,
and real treasures to be had for your efforts, and
frankly, your real future
is at stake. You just have to gain "the sight" in order to
penetrate the illusions.
Visit
losthorizons.com to get the counter-spells and get onto
the real field of battle!
*****
PRO TIP: If I were the IRS and I wanted to
discourage people from rebutting allegations that
they had done things I can tax, and wanted to keep them from
successfully reclaiming withheld or paid-in money, I
would salt the "tax honesty" community with
passionate-seeming "legal researchers" who would
warn anyone whose ear they captured that filing a
1040 is a bad idea for one reason or another...
*****
Illuminating Anniversaries of this week:
April 25- In 1846, a U.S. patrol excursion across the Texas
border into Mexico precipitates the Mexican-American War. In 1859, ground is
broken for the Suez Canal. In 1898, the United States declares war on Spain,
using the pretext of the mysterious sinking of the USS Maine in a Cuban harbor.
The war resulted in U.S. claims of ownership of the Philippines, Guam, and
Puerto Rico, and a more limited sovereignty over Cuba. In 1916, Britain
declares martial law in Ireland in response to the Easter Uprisings. In 1953,
the structure of DNA is described. In 1961, the integrated circuit is
patented. In 1983, Pioneer 10, launched March 2, 1972, passes the orbit of
Pluto.
If you're not talking this one up everywhere and
helping generate a buzz, you don't really want liberty and the
rule of law...
*****
In light of
the actual evidence, those
who doubt or
deny the accuracy and correctness of
CtC just because some government officials
denounce it are like the 16th-century Europeans who
were mystified by
Copernicus getting all those
astronomical predictions right even though the
church had said he was wrong.
*****
Did you miss the 'Set Your Church Free'
commentaries?
Ignorance of the true nature of the "income" tax
has gagged, gutted and seduced-into-disgrace America's
ministerial community. This must change.
*****
You're a
passenger on a riverboat that relies on regular
contributions of fuel from the passengers to
keep moving forward. You see an unsurvivable
waterfall ahead, and note a
soon-to-be-irresistible current growing stronger
each day. What does common sense suggest?
*****
Test Your
"Income" Tax IQ!
CtC Warrior
SanDiegoScott has put together a great little 20-question quiz
to test your knowledge of the law regarding the United States
"income" tax. Test yourself, test your friends and family!
Test your accountant and tax attorney, and help them learn the
liberating truth!!
April 26- In 1607, English colonists make landfall at
Cape Henry, Virginia before going on to establish Jamestown. In 1865,
Confederate General Joseph Johnson surrenders to Union General William
Tecumseh Sherman near Durham, North Carolina; and John Wilkes Booth is
reportedly found and killed by Union cavalry troops in North Virginia.
In 1933, the Gestapo is established in Germany. In 1982, a South Korean
police officer spends eight hours using his department-issued weapons
(and a few others selected from the police armory) systematically
killing 57 civilians-- most in their homes, but the first three being
the local telephone exchange operators.
*****
"Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a
people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power
which knowledge gives."
"It is not the function of our Government to keep
the citizen from falling into error; it is the function of the
citizen to keep the Government from falling into error."
-United States Supreme Court Justice Robert H. Jackson
April 27- In 1773, the British Parliament grants a monopoly
of tea imports into North America to the politically-connected British East
India Company. In 1861, Lincoln suspends habeas corpus in order to
facilitate his suppression of dissent against his policies. In 1945, Benito
Mussolini is captured by Italian partisans while trying to escape Italy
disguised as a German soldier. In 1974, 10,000 march in Washington calling
for Richard Nixon's impeachment. In 2002, the last successful signal
exchange with the Pioneer 10 spacecraft takes place as it continues its
journey toward interstellar space. In 2018, North and South Korea declared
an end to the Korean War.
*****
*****
'The BOSTONIAN'S Paying the EXCISE-MAN, or
TARRING & FEATHERING' (1774) (How our forefathers responded to arrogant
"Rule of Law defiers"...)
*****
The willingness of some people to trade liberty for
convenience is without limit...
"All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed,
second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident."
-Arthur
Schopenhauer
*****
Illuminating Anniversaries of this week:
April 28- In 1788, Maryland becomes the
seventh state to ratify the United States Constitution. In 1945, Italian
fascist dictator Benito Mussolini is executed by fed-up Italian citizens. In
1947, Thor Heyerdahl sets out from Peru bound for Polynesia on the Kon-Tiki raft
to prove that it could be done. In 1952, the post-World War II occupation of
Japan ends after 6 1/2 years. In 1996, President Bill Clinton testifies for the
defense in the "Whitewater" land fraud, conspiracy and political corruption
trial of his and Hillary's partners Jim and Susan MacDougall and then-Arkansas
governor Jim Guy Tucker.
*****
Last Word
"If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude
greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We
seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that
feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget
that ye were our countrymen."
-Samuel
Adams, Architect of the first American Revolution
OK, Now Back To Your Regularly Scheduled Programming:
Is this newsletter of any value to you? If so, please
consider a donation
to help keep it available, or it soon won't be. Donations can
be sent to:
Hendrickson is also a widely-read essayist on
matters of politics, public policy and law; many of these works
are collected in his second book, �Upholding
the Law And Other Observations�. He is a member of Mensa;
an
award-winning artist; and has paid his dues as a youth
soccer coach. He is a long-time political activist as well, and
has served as co-chair and platform convention delegate of
Michigan�s largest county Libertarian Party organization; as a
consultant to the National Right to Work Foundation and Citizens
for a Sound Economy; as a member of the Heartland Institute; and
as a member of the International Society for Individual
Liberty. He is a frequent radio-show guest on stations across
the country.
Hendrickson's business career has included nearly a
decade-and-a-half at the leading edge of the renewable-energy
industry, both as Director of Purchasing and Materials
Management and member of the R&D board at Starpak Energy
Systems, the mid-west's then-largest solar heating and
energy-recovery-and re-utilization company; and as founder and
president of AFJ Inc., a high-efficiency lighting design,
manufacture and installation firm.
Beginning in the mid-1990s and continuing for the
twelve years before his present full-time focus on the
restoration of the rule of law in America, Hendrickson directed
purchasing activities for the $84 million-a-year
multi-family-housing division of the Farmington Hills, Michigan
branch of Edward Rose and Sons, with responsibility for 18,000+
apartments, direct supervision of 35 technicians and agents, and
incidental authority over several hundred divisional workers.
He also ran the division's 10 cable television earth-station and
distribution systems in four states, and designed and
administered the company's website.
On rather the other end of the spectrum, amidst
these more mundane pursuits Hendrickson co-founded and was the
primary creative force behind a small
board- and
card-game company that enjoyed a modest success for several
years.
Hendrickson makes his home in southeast Michigan,
with his wife and two children. He is currently working on his
next book.
� All written and graphic material on this page and
website are copyrighted by Peter E. Hendrickson, unless otherwise attributed.