|
The News Current Events and Continuing Education for October 17 through October 30, 2016 “Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” -James Madison
"There are two distinct classes of men...those who pay taxes and those who receive and live upon taxes." - Thomas Paine C'mon! CtC can't be right! You're crazy! If CtC were actually right, it would mean the government's been concealing and denying the truth for years on end, and everybody knows THAT would never happen... (Edward Snowden, come home! It was all just a bad dream; there really is No Such Agency!)
Do you know someone truly steeped in the Kool-Aid?
I mean someone who finds it easier to believe that the far-better-educated, far-more-suspicious-of-government Americans of a hundred years ago were complete morons who granted authority to the state to take whatever it wished from themselves and their posterity than to imagine that they themselves simply misunderstand the true nature of the income tax? Even while knowing that their beliefs about the tax are derived entirely from the representations of those who profit from those beliefs (like tax bureaucrats and "tax professionals")?
Do you know someone like that? Shake them awake with the latest (fourteenth) edition of CtC!
I'm delighted when anyone wishes to share what I have posted here with others! Sharing this page is an important means of moving toward the restoration of the rule of law-- PLEASE DO IT!! But I'd appreciate your doing so by directing your friends here themselves, rather than by copying and emailing the material.
*** The Newsletter is interested in your work! If you are a writer, scholar, or just a dedicated Warrior with a good story to tell, please consider sharing your words and your wisdom with our thousands of readers! Click here to learn how.
*****
-Samuel Adams
Doreen's Supreme Court Petition Gets A Little Recognition This may or may not mean much, but it's gratifying to think that SOMEONE is noticing... I WAS PLEASED TO LEARN LAST WEEK that Bloomberg's Criminal Law Reporter, a very well-respected, subscription-only service made use of by a lot of legal professionals, has found the petition for cert. that we filed in late August worthy of note. I don't know how rarefied such attention may be, but I imagine that only a handful of the 10,000 or so petitions filed each year are singled-out in this way. Bloomberg was gracious enough to send us a .pdf of the September 18 posting, but because it is a subscription-only journal, I don't feel I would fairly return the courtesy if I posted it here. However, the write-up is simple, and a description will suffice. It begins with a summary of the case taken from the Sixth Circuit's evasive affirmation of Doreen's conviction. This "highlight" of this summary is the Sixth's euphemistic (indeed, contemptible) description of Doreen's complaint about the orders she is resisting as having been "not properly issued". The real complaint is that the orders are Constitutionally-prohibited and therefore without authority, of course. Also notable in the summary is the reference to the two orders as one single order. This fiction became necessary when the government realized before trial that its only hope of conviction lay in a requested instruction that the jury not be required to reach a unanimous verdict. The Sixth Circuit's hinky-jinks are followed by the two questions presented in the petition for cert. So, at least anyone reading the CLR presentation does get a chance to see the real issues. IN LIGHT OF THE ATTENTION GIVEN BY BLOOMBERG-- which may lead to attention by others, at long last-- I want to refresh everyone on Doreen's case, so that all those who recognize its significance can be as effective as possible in getting it out there and generating some of what would be a very helpful buzz. So, here are a few bullet points:
THIS IS JUST a partial list of "highlights" of this remarkable, unprecedented case. But these points should be enough to equip everyone to raise public consciousness wherever the opportunity arises. I'll be grateful for anything anyone is able to do. "It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men." -Samuel Adams Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend
Feel free to copy and post the graphic above everywhere and anywhere, friends. ***** 100 Years Of Thwarting Life. What A Shameful Anniversary... LET ME TAKE THIS OCCASION TO OFFER Planned Parenthood and a candid world the libertarian answer to the abortion conundrum. As will be seen, it is possible to respect the rights of all parties involved while really and truly making abortion rare. Bring 'Em Out Alive
THE LEGAL THEORIES which keep the noxious abortion controversy alive in the face of steady majority opposition to the practice are really those of trespass and involuntary servitude, the Supreme Court’s nonsense about a penumbra of privacy notwithstanding. There IS a penumbra of privacy in any system of government based on a limited delegation of authority to the state-- but it is irrelevant to the abortion question. Citing that penumbra was an artifice by which the court tarted up with legalese the casting of the issue as a Hobson’s choice between violating a defensible claim to autonomy by the woman on the one hand and the proactive death of the fetus on the other (with the ridiculous argument that early-stage humans are not ‘human’ being deployed like a thumb on one side of the scale). The strained privacy and fetal-inhumanity claims never commanded much meaningful respect from abortion’s opponents; but instinctive American support for the much more defensible position regarding the woman's sovereignty furnished abortion advocates with a means to obscure the contrived and false characterization of the dilemma and steer consideration of the issue in a direction that favored their cause. Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend Trump Melts Down; Go, Johnson! IT'S KIND OF A SHAME to see Donald Trump systematically compromise the political capital he had accumulated during the primary campaign. But it's definitely happening. During that primary season, Trump distinguished himself from the rest of the Republican candidate pack. He earned a victory by articulating a few rational positions regarding foreign policy (i.e., withdrawing from a now useless NATO; pulling troops in from trigger-point deployments in countries which should be bearing their own costs of defense; recognizing that Israel is not the 51st state; and having a grown-up perspective on Russia). Of course, what good there was suffered from Trump's vulgarity, bombast, inconsistency and other flaws. But most of his outrageous proposals were harmless, being concerned with things outside the control of the office he seeks. Only foreign policy is actually in the hands of the president, and on that front Trump stood out with far better positions than any of his Republican (or Democrat) rivals. UNFORTUNATELY, UPON SECURING THE REPUBLICAN NOMINATION Trump rapidly began collapsing. He has persisted in relying almost entirely on demagoguery in lieu of actual plans for implementing his declared policies, and has done his best to avoid declaring those policies with any exactitude. He has actually hired advisors straight from the war-mongering nuthouses and even picked a VP who embraces the neocon line on the virtues of perpetual war. Most recently, Trump deeply dissed his supporters by not bothering to prepare for the first debate, suggesting that he is not taking seriously his responsibility as the Republican place-holder to do his level best to win the office. This guy should be working 24/7 to become impressively knowledgeable and intellectually-organized from a policies-and-positions standpoint. Instead of boning up and working for mastery of what would be his responsibilities, Trump continues to shoot from the lip (and unimpressively even at that). He apparently imagines that just griping about the status quo, without explaining in concrete, well-thought-out terms what he would do differently, is good enough to capture the independents and cross-over Democrats he will have to have in order to win. Worse, Trump actually revealed a totalitarian side in that first debate with his endorsement of the Constitution-defying "stop and frisk" practices of the New York police department. This is a disturbingly good fit with his un-retracted 2013 condemnation of Edward Snowden. In the second debate Trump was better-prepared. But he continued to back-pedal on the primary-season foreign-policy positions that were the only thing going for him as a candidate (or at best deliver decidedly mixed messages). And even better-prepared, Trump was markedly unimpressive. It can certainly still be said that it would be far better to take a chance on Trump than accept the known outcome from the election of Hillary Clinton. But the "far" is becoming less far every day. (Even on the issue of Supreme Court appointments Trump fails to stand out-- one of his announced "short-list" nominees is the lead judge in the outrageous, Constitution-scorning ruling being appealed by this petition to the Supreme Court.) IN LIGHT OF ALL THE FOREGOING, it's time for a serious reconsideration of the Gary Johnson candidacy. At this point, there is little to lose by doing so. Trump's disaffection of his base, and his inability or unwillingness to meaningfully work for independent and breakaway Democratic votes means he has less and less chance of winning in November. Johnson's chances are even more remote, of course, but helping ensure a strong showing for the Libertarian party candidate this year can pay dividends in 2020. And frankly, if Johnson gets into the remaining debate, doesn't mimic Trump by being unprepared, and actually articulates his positions competently, he could win. It is certainly true that Johnson has weaknesses as a candidate, and he isn't even much of a libertarian.* However, even adulterated libertarianism beats business-as-usual Washington all hollow, both from a standpoint of policy superiority and political power. Although Johnson doesn't understand the income tax, and actually argues in favor of the disastrous "Fair Tax" (indeed, the Libertarian Party as a whole completely misunderstands the income tax, and what a shame that is!), on most other fronts his policies are pretty attractive. I'd rather have what Johnson advocates than what Hillary or Trump does by a million miles, and I'll bet that a very large number of other Americans would find that they feel the same way if they knew the difference. The bottom line is that I am not viewing Johnson as a standard-bearer for libertarian dogma, nor even as a model representative of the Libertarian Party. But I am viewing him as the candidate who would do the least harm and the most good should he get the office, regardless of his personal attributes or the label under which he runs, and since he is now as likely as Trump to get there, he is now the one who should therefore be getting the support. Go, Johnson!
*Johnson is not a real libertarian, but Trump and his many predecessors as Republican nominees haven't been real republicans either, at least not insofar as that term is understood by its adherents, nor even as it is portrayed in official Republican platform pronouncements. Maybe I've missed it, but I haven't noticed any reduction in the size of the state or any of the other things supposedly near and dear to the hearts of real Republicans even during periods when nominal members of that party controlled both houses of Congress and the presidency. Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend Have You Been Harassed By "Frivolous" Threats? Don't stand for it; it's time for a class-action lawsuit. CtC FIRST BEGAN LIBERATING AMERICANS from the scourge of the misapplied "income" tax (aka the "ignorance tax") in 2003. Over all the years since, the beneficiaries of the status quo have been trying various things to suppress the spread of the book's information and to discourage claims made in light of that information. One of the longest-running ploys has been subjecting a scattershot smattering of CtC-educated filers to scary-looking threats of a "frivolous return penalty" (FRP). The scamsters' hopes have always been that these threats will be mistaken as some kind of official dispute of the accuracy of the book's info, or at least will prompt rumors that the government pushes back against educated filings, which will discourage the timid from standing up for their rights and the rule of law. These threats are often very overtly phony. Sometimes they arrive in the mailbox on the same day as the complete refund claimed by the filing being called "frivolous". Sometimes a single filing will be the pretext for a dozen of these FRP assertions, as though the button on the "scary-letter" machine got held down too long. (Those interested can find an expose of an elaborate IRS hoax concerning FRPs and CtC-educated filings here, and some in-depth discussion of the actual FRP provisions here.) DESPITE THEIR LEGAL PHONINESS, FRP threats have done a lot of harm. They DO lead to rumors which have kept some folks who otherwise would have from even cracking open a book and learning the truth about the tax, and why it's so important. They HAVE disturbed the peace and quiet of those to whom they have been directed, and forced those folks into a tedious routine of writing and expensively-mailing responses. A few educated filers have even had a portion of a complete refund dinged with a holdback of an asserted FRP liability. In all cases these FRP threats amount to First Amendment assaults. All of them-- regardless of how specious-- involve government threats of harm unless the target repudiates his or her freely-made return testimony and replaces it with testimony more to the government's liking (for which a 30-day window is typically provided). In short, these threats are outrageous and illegal. So... I THINK IT'S TIME for a class-action lawsuit. I'm not a litigator, and can't say from experience what kind of relief could be sought. But I know that some kind of substantial relief is called for here, and I can certainly equip an experienced litigator with all the needed understanding of the law regarding FRPs and everything else that would be involved in such a suit. Therefore I want to invite anyone out there who had been the recipient of these threats to take a couple of simple steps toward qualifying for the class. First, secure documentation of the agency bad behavior through FOIA requests for relevant internal records. A package of sample requests with the relevant materials listed can be found here. Second, send me scans of the documents yielded-up from the requests and the filings that purportedly prompted the documented threats. Follow the formatting guidelines found here. Presuming that at least a few dozen folks send in proper educated filings along with documentation of the actual appearance of the bogus threats in the official records, in all their hoaxy and statute-defying ugliness, a suit will be organized and we'll see what can be done. "Power concedes nothing without a demand. It never did and it never will. Find out just what any people will quietly submit to and you have the exact measure of the injustice and wrong which will be imposed on them, and these will continue till they have been resisted with either words or blows, or with both. The limits of tyrants are prescribed by the endurance of those whom they suppress." -Frederick Douglass Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend Thank goodness the sun is now shining...
Brian's Illustrated Refund Claim A nice federal victory accompanied by graphics to help others and an excellent blog-post explaining it all LIBERTARIAN ACTIVIST AND AUTHOR BRIAN WRIGHT celebrates his second educated-filing victory this week, adding a complete federal refund for 2015 (with interest) received last week to his complete Michigan refund for 2015 which was posted last spring. Here is the check:
...and here is the filing that produced that complete refund. Here are Brian's introductory comments concerning educated filings that he wanted me to post for the benefit of others: —Comment by Brian R. Wright— It’s important for CtC filers to understand that they are dealing with an immense, ponderous, but rule-based system. The system will obey the rules, 99% of the time, and if you don’t raise any rule-defying flag, you’ll get your property back. Nobody is out to get you for speaking out or being politically active; I, myself, am living proof of that: I wrote a book about Doreen’s ordeal (The Motor City Witchcraft Trials) and was a witness for Doreen at that proceeding. The prosecution, in front of the judge, quoted to the court from my Website, “… that this was a Kangaroo Court with a capital ‘K’… etc.” The prosecutor was outraged and the judge gave me a dirty look. They KNOW who I am and that I’ve pushed the boundaries of the 1st Amendment in condemning and ridiculing them. [The only exception is if from very high in the management of that system, they want to single you out because you are threatening to expose them—as the diabolical Men of the Power Sickness VERY HIGH in the US Justice Department (and/or perhaps Homeland Security) pulled the strings to lawlessly per/prosecute Pete and, then, Doreen… not even the Mafia goes after your family or women.] So read Cracking the Code, DO Cracking the Code—using the simple templates and resources available on Pete’s site losthorizons.com—, and take back your money and power by locating and shutting the spigot by which the Men of the Power Sickness drain your precious bodily fluids. It’s your blood and treasure. Take it and keep it. For heaven’s sake, stand up and man up for yourself and your family. ...and here is Brian's blog post discussing this victory and the importance of standing up for the rule of law in greater depth. It's well worth reading. FINALLY, BRIAN, A DYNAMO of activism, has even gone so far as to render his "information return" rebuttals from this filing as graphics with explanatory notes for those who are not yet veterans:
GOT TO LOVE this fine, heroic American! Brian has stepped up and acted to restrain the dangerous and corrupt state and uphold the rule of law, something desperately needed from everyone. His latest victory joins those of the tens of thousands of other awakened and activated Americans represented here, and is another step toward the restoration of the Founders republic and the true rule of law. Don't you wish your victories were proudly posted, too? It's easy. Stand up on behalf of the law, and then share the evidence. That's all there is to it! Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend
A Review of CtC by Derek Cushman
You can also find this film at https://vimeo.com/175424277. Regarding Trolleries (Deceitful efforts to discourage Americans from learning the truth about the "income tax")
The plane that gets the most flak is the one that's right above the target.
FOR ALL THE YEARS SINCE 2003 when CtC was first published, the government has engaged in a concerted effort to frighten people away from its truths. This effort involves official government websites and press releases touting an occasional court ruling that appears to be at odds with some CtC-revelation (but without details sufficient to expose the real substance of the ruling)-- and sometimes even more mendacious behavior. Click here for the rest of this article Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend ***** Are the presentations and resources offered on this site and in my other work of any value to you?
Tim Kendrick has posted a video on YouTube regarding donations. I didn't know what to do about it to begin with; I don't do what I do intending for anyone to feel obligated in any way. But of course, no one IS obligated. I will continue to make my work freely-available here, and in my books for only the cost of a cheap paperback. Thus, even though I post it here below, Tim's very thoughtful personal resolution and encouragement to others is just an invitation for consideration by those who may not be conscious of the fact that I can't do what I do without support. No one is to feel any pressure from it; if it moves anyone to act let it be solely because it seems right.
*****
Why Does The Government Lie About 'Cracking the Code'? THE ANSWER TO THAT QUESTION is the key to the restoration of the republic and the rule of law in America. See it below. (NOTE: It's very important that the entire 24 minutes be viewed.)
This video can also be found on YouTube at https://youtu.be/hgzzYl-eeUI. Here are links to the two pages to which viewers are directed at the end of the film: The Crime of the Century and The Truth About The 16th Amendment. The other two mentioned in the film are this one (the "bulletin board" stack of 1,200 or so posted refunds and other victories in knowledgably applying the law; and this one (the collection of resisted claims and the outcomes of those little battles). PLEASE be a real activist about sending this link to every single person in your address book, and about sharing it through facebook, reddit, twitter, and any other distribution channel with which you are familiar. Send it to every journalist you can. It's time to really make something happen. Accompany your emails and posts with with a strong admonishment to watch the film through, and that doing so will show the viewer an individual-empowering, state-restraining truth about the income tax which the government has been trying to keep hidden from view for 75 years and which that person really needs to know. BY THE WAY, as is impossible to miss, I have neither the skills nor the tools to make even moderately good films. This is simply not my forte. Anyone able to do better is encouraged to talk to me about that. As is ALSO impossible to miss, though-- even in my amateur production-- reader video testimonials have GREAT POWER. Send me yours. Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend A Patriot Activist Talks About CtC "McFloyd" on who got the tax wrong, and who gets it right
***** What's your answer?
***** How To Be A Leader In The CtC Community It's simple KNOW THE TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX IN DETAIL KNOW WHERE TO FIND THE RESOURCES BE FAMILIAR WITH THE SCAMS, THE MISUNDERSTANDINGS, AND THE TROLL-POLLUTION TAKE CHARGE IN YOUR STATE FORUM, HELPING EVERYONE TO THINK CLEARLY AND STAY ON TOPIC All-in-all, just be the sort of person for others that you would go to yourself for trustworthy leadership. Leadership is a challenge. But it's not complicated, and you can do it.
Care to post a comment on this article? Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend
True American Joe Black Testifies And Shares Victories For Liberty And The Rule Of Law ...as every American should... EDUCATED AMERICAN GROWN-UP JOE BLACK has stood up and acted to enforce the law upon its domestic enemies-- or, at least, upon agencies of the state whose operators seem to happily exploit ignorance and mis-apply the law at every chance for their personal benefit. Get inspired and encouraged by Joe's video sharing his spirit, his testimony and the acknowledgements he has secured:
Find more testimonial videos
here, and please, people, share these around as widely as
you can. To learn what, how and why to share your own testimony
(with or without mere practical victories to go along with the
far more important spiritual victories that are the real heart
of
CtC), click
here.
Care
to post a comment on this article?
Set a brushfire-- E-mail this newsletter to a friend Two Simple Questions For Every Silent
"Alt-Media" Journalist The silence of these folks is the
liberation bottleneck. Maybe this'll help, if enough people
ask...
HERE'S A SIMPLE QUESTION: The income tax is, and always has
been,
an excise tax on privilege. This is established beyond any
controversy whatever by
repeated Supreme Court rulings, the words of the related laws,
and, since 2003, by
hundreds of thousands of acknowledgements by federal and state
tax agencies.
You, like most folks, have been fooled into inadvertently
agreeing that your economic activities are exercises of
privilege, thereby allowing the tax to be applied to your
earnings. Why is this so hard for you to admit?
HERE'S ANOTHER SIMPLE QUESTION: You and everyone else being
fooled into agreeing that your economic activities are
privileged and thereby allowing them to be taxed is
what enables the flow of wealth that finances all the bad things
done by the state o of which you complain in every column. Why
is this so hard for you to admit?
I GUESS THESE ACTUALLY LEAD TO A THIRD SIMPLE QUESTION: If you
really feel that all these things of which you complain are so
bad, why are you not helping more Americans understand
the
true nature of the tax and the ill effects of it being misunderstood
and misapplied?
*****
PRO TIP: By the
physics of the law, an indirect tax is necessarily a
privilege tax. Here's why: The distinction between a
direct tax and an indirect tax is incidence. A
direct tax arises by the direct imposition of the
taxer, without any election of the taxed (other than
that of authorizing the taxing power in the first
place). An
indirect tax arises by the taxed
choosing to to to to do
something by which the taxer's claim is then
created. The choice that is a valid object of an
indirect tax can't be anything done as an exercise
of an untaxable right. Nor can it be any activity of
necessity. A tax on anything done by necessity would
arise not by actual election of the taxed but simply
because the tax had been imposed by the taxer. Such
a tax, whatever it may be called, would be in actual
substance a direct tax, even if one that arose only
intermittently. Think of a tax on eating, for
example, or working, or engaging in trade with
others (all of which are things done by right as
well as by necessity, but you get the point). What is left as the
valid object of an indirect tax is the exercise of
privilege-- something done not by right, and
therefore done by the permission of the taxer (who,
due to being possessed of an ownership right in the
thing being permitted, is entitled to claim of
portion of the proceeds when the thing is profitably
used). "[Although the Legislature
may declare as privileges and tax as such for State
revenue purposes those pursuits and occupations that
are not matters of common right], the Legislature
has no power to declare as a privilege and tax for
revenue purposes occupations that are of common
right."
Sims v. Ahrens
The 'Watching the Watchmen Amendment' If you're not talking this one up everywhere and
helping generate a buzz, you don't really want liberty and the
rule of law... PRO TIP: The
argument that a concept explicitly given a statutory
definition for purposes of this or that chapter or
"title" has the same meaning as the common word the
legislature has borrowed for its label-- which
meaning plainly didn't suit the legislature's
purposes, hence its replacement-- is a preposterous
reading of the law. “It is axiomatic that the
statutory definition of the term excludes unstated
meanings of that term.”
Meese v. Keene “[W]e are not at liberty to
put our gloss on the definition that Congress
provided by looking to the generally accepted
meaning of the defined term.”
In light of
the actual evidence, , those
who doubt or
deny the accuracy and correctness of
CtC just
because government officials make weaselly
representations against it are like the 16th-century Europeans who
were mystified by
Copernicus getting all those
astronomical predictions right even though the
church had said he was wrong.
****** NEW! Orders of twelve or more books now come with a free DVD containing six informative and inspiring videos-- 112 minutes in all. Click here for the details.
Do you have a victory to share? Click here to learn how to do so.
If you're working on one, and just getting stonewalled or speed-bumped, you can still be recognized! Go here to learn what to do. Learn The Liberating Truth About The Tax ***** Did you miss the 'Set Your Church Free' commentaries? Ignorance of the true nature of the "income" tax has gagged, gutted and seduced-into-disgrace America's ministerial community. This must change.
Copy and post this one around, people!
*****
Media Evasion Of CtC Must End, Now Time, unfortunately, is on the side of the well-funded disinformation specialists class
Illuminating anniversaries of this week: October 28- In 1886,
the Statue of Liberty is dedicated by President Grover
Cleveland. In 1918, Czechoslovakia is granted independence from
Austria-Hungary. In 1919, Congress passes the Volstead Act over
Woodrow Wilson's veto, by which Prohibition would begin two
months later. In 1922, Mussolini's fascists march on Rome and
take over the government of Italy. In 1929, the markets keep
falling (Black Monday). In 1962, US President John F. Kennedy
and Soviet Premier Nikita Khruschev reach an agreement for the
removal of American-targeted nuclear missiles from Cuba, in
exchange for a pledge of no American invasion of the island
nation and the eventual removal of American missiles targeting
the Soviet Union from Turkey and Italy. In 2005, Lewis
(Scooter) Libby is indicted on perjury and obstruction of
justice charges over his efforts to shield Bush administration
officials from consequences related to the Valerie Plame
affair. Eventually convicted, Libby's prison sentence was
promptly commuted by George W. Bush.
Are You Having Trouble Spreading The Word? SKEPTICISM (SOMETIMES INVOKED BY FEAR) IS TO BE EXPECTED when you're trying to explain to someone that everything they've been encouraged their whole lives to believe about something as entrenched and significant as the income tax is basically nonsense. So here's a way to help cut through the resistance: Ask your listener how he or she would react if you were to show an announcement from the Commissioner of Internal Revenue admitting that the tax doesn't apply to the earnings of most Americans and is misapplied most of the time because people don't understand how it works? Or how about if you showed a ruling from the Supreme Court saying the same? Now you just have to explain that you're going to show exactly those things-- but because the state really doesn't want people to know this, these things haven't been said quite as forthrightly as we would all wish. It's going to take a bit more work to take these admissions in than is sufficient for just reading a press release. But it'll be worth the effort... *****
Real Americans don't accommodate fog, lies and a sliding scale of adherence to the rule of law. Real American men and women stand up for the truth and the law, come what may, knowing that it is only by setting the bar at the top and enforcing it, come what may, that liberties are secured.
"Heaven knows how to put a proper price upon its goods; and it would be strange indeed if so celestial an article as freedom should not be highly rated." -Thomas Paine
OUTREACH!!! JOB ONE, PEOPLE!!! SPREAD. THE. WORD. ONLY ONE THING WILL WIN YOU YOUR LIBERTY: Spreading the truth. Accordingly, I've assembled outreach resources into a new, dedicated page. Find it here, and please, USE THESE TOOLS!! I can't do this all by myself. "In a time of universal deceit - telling the truth is a revolutionary act." -George Orwell *****
“Knowledge will forever govern ignorance; and a people who mean to be their own governors must arm themselves with the power which knowledge gives.” -James Madison
How About You?
Are You Governing Yourself? Get The Knowledge, Reclaim Your Power, And Stand With The Founders
There is little more important to the long-term health of America than how our children are educated..
Some Observations Regarding Educated And Accurate Filing
Have You Taken A Military, Law Enforcement or Public Office Oath To Uphold And Defend The Constitution?
*****
'Don't Tread On Me' Polo Shirts Say It All!
*****
More Than Two Thirds Of The Several States That Collect "Income" Taxes Have Now Acknowledged The Truth About The Law As Revealed In CtC, And Have Issued Complete Refunds Accordingly! See The Following Chart...
'The BOSTONIAN'S Paying the EXCISE-MAN, or TARRING & FEATHERING' (1774) (How our forefathers responded to arrogant "Rule of Law defiers"...)
*****
HELP SPREAD THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX “All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed, second it is violently opposed, and third, it is accepted as self-evident.” -Arthur Schopenhauer
Get your FREE* CtC bumper sticker and help spread the word! Just send a stamped, self-addressed envelope to Lost Horizons, Bumper Sticker Offer, 232 Oriole Rd., Commerce Twp., MI 48382 (*If you want to throw a few bucks into the envelope to help with costs, that'd be nice, but it's entirely optional...)
*****
"Taxes are not raised to carry on wars, wars are raised to carry on taxes." -Thomas Paine
Where To Find Things On This Site
Law Professor James Duane Says: "Don't Talk To The Police. Period."
*****
Films That Belong In Every Home Library
Ever Wonder How Much An Unrestrained FedState Would Like To Tap You For?
*****
Warrior David Larson shares this beautiful little farce, wryly observing that, "Depositors have "..not lost one penny.." - OK we could agree on that simple statement ..how about the purchasing power of that same penny 'not lost'?"
Source: Bureau of Labor Statistics
*****
Last Word "If ye love wealth greater than liberty, the tranquility of servitude greater than the animating contest for freedom, go home from us in peace. We seek not your counsel, nor your arms. Crouch down and lick the hand that feeds you. May your chains set lightly upon you; and may posterity forget that ye were our countrymen." -Samuel Adams, Architect of the First American Revolution
OK, Now Back To Your Regularly Scheduled Programming:
Order Books, Warrior-Wear, or The CtC Companion CD
An "Income" Tax Related Site Map
E-mail this Newsletter to a friend
Want to get on the Newsletter mailing list? Just send an email from the address you want added to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with "Subscribe me" in the subject line, and your name in the body!
PLEASE CONTINUE TO DILIGENTLY SPREAD THE LIBERATING TRUTH ABOUT THE TAX!!!
*****
© All written and graphic material on this page and website are copyrighted by Peter E. Hendrickson, unless otherwise attributed |


























