How Pathetic To Have To Pretend That These Are Real Questions...
And isn't it time for every self-avowed liberty-activist to be shouting "NO!" in answer?
READ THE WHOLE PETITION HERE.
Read it and weep for the corruption that has taken hold of our institutions of government while too many of us were letting our "public servant" chauffeurs do all the driving instead of staying actively in charge ourselves.
Read it, and get scared-- because you should be. For yourselves and for your children.
DOREEN'S CASE IS THE MOST OVERT and unmistakable case of raw judicial corruption and systemic assault on the Constitution and the rule of law that has ever been seen. A lot of bad rulings have happened over recent years. But there have been no others in which, to take one example that you just saw in reading the petition, a federal appellate court has actually argued in a written, published ruling that a statute which reads, "Disobedience or resistance to its lawful writ, process, order, rule, decree, or command," doesn't actually include "lawfulness" as an element of the offense (and that someone can be punished for failing to obey an unlawful order).
Here's another good example: In no other case in American history has a federal court deliberately-- and in a formal "finding", no less-- misrepresented the content of a book.
So the lawlessness is unprecedented. But on the other hand, so is the reason for it. This unprecedented lawlessness is meant to suppress an equally unprecedented opportunity for the American people.
What all this unique government lawlessness underscores is the fact that CtC presents the American people with the one and only way that Leviathan can be cut back down to safe and tolerable size, and true federalism and the rule of law can be restored. CtC is the red-pill the masters of the matrix have been hoping for 75 years would never appear.
THAT SOUNDS LIKE a pretty darn hi-falutin' claim, doesn't it? Well... maybe so, but the evidence lies right before you. In fact, you just looked at it.
How do you tell which plane is right above the target? It's the one getting the heaviest flak.
We all expect to see corruption in government pretty much every where we look these days. But there has never been anything done before anywhere by United States officials as has been done in Doreen's case, and in all the preceding events related to Doreen's case.
Never before has a DOJ attorney flatly lied in a complaint about the grounds for a suit, with a federal judge repeating the lie in a formal "finding". Never before has such an attorney resorted to presenting an "informal examination report" as "support" for an allegation of tax liabilities in a civil lawsuit.
Never before have a federal trial court judge and government prosecutor flatly lied to a jury in open court about the content of a statute, while actually holding in their hands the complete and accurate text of the statute they were misrepresenting.
And, of course, never before has anyone been ordered, on pain of imprisonment, to withdraw claims against the government and replace them with government-dictated, government-serving, false sworn declarations of belief.
GET THE MESSAGE BEING TELEGRAPHED by all these unique, ongoing, and otherwise inexplicable events. What all these one-off crimes are being committed to suppress IS A VERY, VERY BIG DEAL.
You don't even have to understand why CtC's revelations are a big deal, or how they are the sharpened stake poised above the vampire's breast. All you need to see in order to know that it is that sharpened stake is the unprecedented thrashing and gnashing of the vampire itself.
And all you need to DO in order to drive that stake home, restore the real liberty and rule of law for which you have been praying and struggling your entire adult life, and halt America's descent into twilight is help others see the thrashing and gnashing, and then send them here to learn the cause.
I hope you will.
Doreen's Supreme Court Petition Gets Denied
Even as yet another federal judge condemns the orders she was "convicted" for resisting...
ON OCTOBER 20, 2016 THE CLERK of the Supreme Court recorded a denial of Doreen's petition for cert. This doesn't mean that Doreen's appeal was adjudged meritless,* just that the court felt that 74 or 75 other cases were more worthy of its attention. Of the 10,000 or so petitions filed each year, the court only grants and hears about 75.
Ironically, just four days later federal district judge Marcia Crone of the Eastern District of Texas said again what has been said in hundreds of cases throughout America's history without the slightest deviation ever-- except when it comes to Doreen Hendrickson:
It is well settled that the First Amendment protects not only the right to speak but also the right not to speak. For this reason, government compulsion of speech has repeatedly been found to violate the Constitution. See Riley v. Nat’l Fed’n of the Blind of N.C., Inc., 487 U.S. 781, 797 (1988) (overturning law requiring fundraisers to disclose retained revenues to potential donors); Wooley v. Maynard, 430 U.S. 705, 714 (1977); W.Va. State Bd. of Educ. v. Barnette, 319 U.S. 624 (1943); see also Rumsfeld v. Forum for Academic & Institutional Rights, Inc., 547 U.S. 47, 61 (2006); Tex. State Troopers Ass’n v. Morales, 10 F. Supp.2d 628, 634 (N.D. Tex. 1998) (“[T]he First Amendment requires that the State not dictate the content of speech absent necessity, and then, only by means precisely tailored.”*) (citations omitted).
Once First Amendment rights have been chilled, there is no effective remedy, and it is well established in the Fifth Circuit that infringement of First Amendment rights, standing alone, constitutes irreparable harm. See Texans for Free Enter. v. Tex. Ethics Comm’n, 732 F.3d 535, 539 (5th Cir. 2013) (“We have repeatedly held . . . that the loss of First Amendment freedoms, for even minimal periods of time, unquestionably constitutes irreparable injury.”) (and accompanying citations); accord Opulent Life Church v. City of Holly Springs, Miss., 697 F.3d 279, 295 (5th Cir. 2012).
ASSOC'D BUILDERS AND CONTRACTORS OF SE TEXAS, et al. v. ANNE RUNG, Administrator, Office of Federal Procurement Policy, Office of Management and Budget, et al., EDT NO. 1:16-CV-425 (2016)
*This quoted language doesn't really reflect some kind of exception allowing the dictation of speech content if deemed a "necessity", or for any other reason. Like the Riley case also cited, Tex. State Troopers Ass’n concerned a mandatory disclosure requirement imposed on solicitors-- that is, a requirement that certain subjects be spoken of to prospective donors in exchange for permission to conduct solicitations. Notwithstanding the rather odd language used, the ruling had nothing to do with an actual dictation of words that must be spoken and declared to be believed true, as in Doreen's case.)
Is the manic evil of what is being done to Doreen (and threatened against all Americans) not clear? The fundamental law of this country-- thoroughly well-settled in its construction by endless judicial rulings-- including last Monday's by judge Marcia Crone-- is that a person can't even be compelled to say what she agrees is true, with or without any attestation of belief in the veracity of the statement.
Dramatically more a violation of the law is a compelled declaration of what someone DOESN'T agree is true. More so still is such a compelled false declaration which must be accompanied by a sworn attestation of belief in the truth of the false dictated speech.
WHAT THE HELL IS WRONG WITH THE LEGAL COMMUNITY IN THIS COUNTRY, THAT IT IS NOT DENOUNCING WHAT IS BEING DONE TO DOREEN AND RISING EN MASSE IN HER DEFENSE?! The silence of that community, and of the media as well, is despicable. I say to all of them: When your time comes, and you are made to drink from the bitter cup you are blithely permitting to be brewed without protest, you will have no one to blame but yourselves.
*"[I]t is elementary, of course, that a denial of a petition for certiorari decides nothing." Hughes Tool Co. v. Trans World Airlines, Inc. 409 U.S. 363, (1973); see also United States et al. v. Carver et al., 260 U.S. 482, (1923) (""The denial of a writ of certiorari imports no expression of opinion upon the merits of the case, as the bar has been told many times.").
THIS IS JUST a partial list of "highlights" of this remarkable, unprecedented case. But these points should be enough to equip everyone to raise public consciousness wherever the opportunity arises. I'll be grateful for anything anyone is able to do.
"It does not take a majority to prevail... but rather an irate, tireless minority, keen on setting brushfires of freedom in the minds of men."