Games - Artwear - Wisdom Wall Art - Stationery - Homeschooling - Don't Tread On Me - Income Tax Truth - Comment - Home |
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eighteen
The refunds reflected in the following checks and notices include EVERYTHING-- Social Security 'contributions' and all-- which was withheld from the private-sector earnings of these upstanding Americans during the relevant years, unless otherwise indicated. These good folks learned the truth, and then simply, and courageously, insisted on lawful behavior from their servant government.
Total retained or refunded so far:
(Actually, this is only the total of the checks and notices I have been sent for posting. Adding what has been merely reported to me would raise the figure a great deal; no doubt the actual overall total of what has been received by readers-- including those who have not shared the news-- is much higher still.)
Steven and Betty Martins
|
See Steven and Betty's 2004 victory here.
Cathie Hamer and Erik Segelstrom
In an interesting expression of stress neurosis (or petulance) in response to Cathie and Erik's CtC-educated filing, the Treasury Dept. has kept back $500 from this refund for a "frivolous return" penalty, even while acknowledging that the return was perfectly proper, and processing it accordingly:
 |
|
Cathie and Erik have spoken with numerous agency workers, all of whom declare themselves mystified about the original penalty charge. They are even more mystified (they say) about the fact that even though this "penalty" has already been improperly deducted from Erik and Cathie's returned property, someone or something in the agency, so thoroughly slapped around by CtC Warriors by now as to be reaching a state of complete dysfunction, just keeps blustering along:
 |
You just can't help but roll your eyes and shake your head, and wonder what these agency people are going to do when they're eventually forced to find honest work...
See Cathie and Erik's 2005 California victory here.
Craig Voigt
|
(2005)
Linda Haney
|
See Linda's 2005 California victory here
Michael Patrick Taylor
|
B. Green
|
|
Bill and Gloria Warnick
|
|
John Ingress
|
Kurt Rowe
|
Click here to see the docs associated with this victory
Click here to see the release of levy Kurt secured three months ago, and here to see his 2004 victory and docs
Jerry and Alicia Bedgood
|
|
|
|
Paul Zaccardi
|
Ron _
|
(2004)
Michael _
 |
(This image combines sections of three separate original pages)
This is a refund-in-progress, of the sort discussed here. Click here to see the filing related to this victory.
T. Michael and Jeanelle Haney
 |
A Connecticut CtC-er
 |
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page One
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Two
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Three
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Four
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Five
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Six
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seven
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eight
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nine
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Ten
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eleven
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twelve
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Thirteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fourteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fifteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Sixteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seventeen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nineteen
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twenty
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyOne
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyTwo
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyThree
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFour
More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFive
Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog is still trying to play its losing hand in a few cases-- particularly where amended returns, in which the filer necessarily disputes his or her own previous testimony, are concerned. Significantly, not once in any of these efforts to discourage or stonewall a proper filing does the government actually challenge or dispute the accuracy of what is revealed in 'Cracking the Code-...'
Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption. Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all.
“God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”
-Daniel Webster
NOTE: Whether any given individual is entitled to a refund depends on a number of different factors, and no one should presume that they are so entitled simply because they see that others are. Each person should educate himself or herself about the particulars of the law, and make his or her own determination in this regard.
To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.
An "Income" Tax Subject Site Map
A Few Words About Tax "Reform"
Use the "Back" button on your browser to return to the previous page
NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned.
When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.
