The Lost Horizons Forum

Why Does The IRS Lie About The Arguments Made In CtC?
This question, though not raised for the first time here, may be more significant than previously imagined... Could the fake "argument" ploy be behind the fake "FRP" ploy?

I HAVE OFTEN POINTED OUT the happy opportunities offered by the fraudulent allegation that CtC argues that only government workers are subject to the income tax. This is the allegation created and deployed by Robert Metcalfe and Nancy Edmunds in 2006 as part of the government's fall-back effort to discourage the spread of CtC's liberating revelations after the failure of its attempts to simply ban the book outright.

The falseness of this assertion by Metcalfe and Edmunds is so transparent, and its creation and deployment so unmistakably corrupt, that anyone to whom the facts are competently-presented should at minimum be made to wonder why such lies would be told in official proceedings and by high officers of government. So, this absurd lie is a wonderful tool to use against the very purpose for which it was created and deployed.

I even created a video rebutting this nonsense, as the final product of a project titled, 'Uki-Goshi'. The name is taken from a Judo maneuver which involves the use of the opponents own weight, strength and momentum against it, just as pointing out the falseness of Metcalfe and Edmunds' allegation about the arguments in CtC is meant to do.

Making this good use of the false allegation remains a very virtuous and productive exercise. It is my serious hope that everyone does all that they can in this regard.

Continued...

The number of case law and Fed Tax court rulings are increasing and there are ample rulings to shut this type of noise down. One must do the homework which enables them to argue these cases to the service. The legal staff knows they are legit.

Hi Don

Any guidance of which cases to look at. I have been completely railroaded multiple FRP and the old computer audit then assessment to Notice of Deficiency. I did not opt for tax court because the whole thing is all BS. but I am now in limbo - they claim my account is locked until a revenue officer needs to be assigned.

I saw your story on LH and was wonder what approach you used to stop the harassment.

Thanks
Andrew