More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eight
Tens of thousands of readers of 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America' have taken control of their own resources, in accordance with, and respect for, the law. The likely total amount reclaimed by these good Americans so far is upward of several billion dollars.
A few of these good American men and women are generous enough to share their victories in upholding the law, for the edification and inspiration of everyone. At the moment the shared refund checks, closing notices, and so forth total:
Richard calculates that if he had left the 1099 for 2004 unrebutted, he would have been presumed to owe $4200 in "income" tax for the year.
The $208 is precisely the (rounded) amount of interest paid to Richard with the complete refunds for 2002 and 2003 that he secured last year-- and the only portion of his total receipts for 2005 which qualified as "income" according to both Richard and the IRS. The docs Richard filed for 2005 can be seen here.
Richard's 2006 federal victory can be seen here.
Brian and Deborah Torrance
Documents associated with this refund can be seen here.
Early in 2005 Gary filed returns for 2001, 2002, 2003 and 2004 expressing his own testimony as to the legal character of his earnings during those years. His calculations resulted in a total "income" tax obligation for each of those years of... zero. Two months ago, Gary called the IRS to ensure that his filings had been received and processed correctly, and received the pleasing news that they had indeed, and that as a result, his 'account' balance for each of those years-- for which not a penny of tax has ever been paid-- is... zero. The transcripts he requested, reflecting these balances, are posted above.
Gary went to the trouble of figuring out the amount for which he would have been presumed liable if, instead of furnishing his own testimony, he had ignorantly (or cravenly) adopted the testimony of others as his own on his returns, the way so many other Americans let themselves be intimidated into doing every year. The amount he has retained as a result of his honesty and courage? More than $40,000.00.
Thanks so much for doing what others either couldn’t or wouldn’t and writing it out so we can see what, why and how these processes should be and look like. I know many others out there are in the same situation as I and need not only encouragement, but also proof that doing it correctly does, in fact, work. I am writing to you today with that in mind. Here’s my story.
For me this started in 1990. I had sold property, moved and started a new job in another state, but had not done what I thought was my duty – paid my taxes. I know better now. In 1991 the IRS contacted me and through the conversation I realized that the only piece of the puzzle they did not have was my autograph; my permission to tax me. The agent said he would send me the documents he had that I needed to go along with my 1040; to date I still have not seen those documents and do not think I ever will.
The above incident started me on a 15-year journey of knowledge culminating with your book. I have heard most of the arguments, like UCC, capital letters, state abbreviations, etc. and as you point out none of them matter. What truly matters is that the IRS, due to incorrect paperwork, believes the only “truth” they have – the 1099 or W-2 from the private companies we work for everyday. I realized after finishing your book that because I was a non-filer I was hurting myself in two ways; first, they had the evidence against me and I was not rebutting it and secondly, I was leaving money in their pockets that belonged to me. Neither, was I thrilled about, so I filed 7 years worth of 1040’s for my state, IL and the Federal government. This happened in mid and late September of 2005. Just days after I filed all of this paperwork I received the dreaded Notice of Levy (NOL). It was mailed from our corporate HR department and they said I had 3 days to respond. I tried to have them read the law – even sent it to them – made no difference. I then contacted the corporate lawyers and sent them section 6331 in its entirety – same response – they were going to follow the “levy” even without a court order. This became a $500.00 per month deduction on my paycheck starting in October, less than 30 days ago.
I would like to share with your readers the following praise report. On November 12, 2005 I received a letter from the IRS; letter number CP12. It states that they have changed my account and 1040 form for 2004. They determined that the excess social security and excess tier 1 RRTA that I put on line 66 of the form was an error and rather than refunding to me the $9,940.99 I was demanding, they adjusted it down to be exactly the same amount of federal taxes withheld from my paycheck for 2004, $6,714.42.
Very shortly I will be sending you the documents so others can see them. Again, thank you for writing the book. Everyone needs to read it and apply the truth they have just read. It will set them free.
Steven DID send the docs, as promised. They can be seen here. As Steven indicated in his note, the IRS is indicating that it is still going to try to keep some of his money as a tax on "income" received, despite the agency's own written acknowledgement that he actually received no "income" during the year (much as in the case discussed here). I guess you have to admire the bold way these guys try to play their losing hand, even if the purpose being served is rankly corrupt...
Robert and Patricia B.
Robert and Patricia secured a complete refund of everything withheld and given over to the state of Louisiana as "income" taxes during 2004--$2711.00-- although the money was diverted elsewhere by the state. Click here to see the docs.
Carmen and Dorothy Sanders
This refund is for $27 less than every penny that had been withheld or paid over to the state for 2002-- that being the total amount that Missouri calculated the Sanders to be liable for after they amended their previously-filed return in the light of their new understanding of the law.
'Cracking the Code-...' warrior Bob Gross opened his mail a few weeks ago and found the most pleasant notice he had ever gotten from the IRS: A "Case Closed" for the 'deficiency' the 'service' had asserted against him for 2003. Bob had filed a 'Schiff-style' "zero" return, had subsequently been being threatened with a levy over what the 'service' claimed he owed for that year and had argued the matter for some time without success. Just after the IRS issued him a formal 'Notice of Deficiency', Bob learned the truth about the law and finally, for the first time, addressed the '1099' evidence on which the calculation of the 'deficiency' was based. The result? See the other docs associated with this victory for the rule of law here.
'Cracking the Code-...' warrior Bob Gross opened his mail a few weeks ago and found the most pleasant notice he had ever gotten from the IRS: A "Case Closed" for the 'deficiency' the 'service' had asserted against him for 2003. Bob had filed a 'Schiff-style' "zero" return, had subsequently been being threatened with a levy over what the 'service' claimed he owed for that year and had argued the matter for some time without success. Just after the IRS issued him a formal 'Notice of Deficiency', Bob learned the truth about the law and finally, for the first time, addressed the '1099' evidence on which the calculation of the 'deficiency' was based. The result?
See the other docs associated with this victory for the rule of law here.
R and D
This refund resulted after a filing which corrected the following IRS record:
Click here for links to more posted victories
Even in the face of the requirements of the law, the junkyard dog is still trying to play its losing hand in a few cases-- particularly where amended returns, in which the filer necessarily disputes his or her own previous testimony, are concerned. Significantly, not once in any of these efforts to discourage or stonewall a proper filing does the government actually challenge or dispute the accuracy of what is revealed in 'Cracking the Code-...'
Click here for more...
Despite the fact that those whose victories are on display here did nothing but insist that the law be applied as it is written, they did so in the face of fearful threats and cunning disinformation from the beneficiaries of corruption. Their actions took great courage and commitment, and I salute them all.
“God grants liberty only to those who love it, and are always ready to guard and defend it.”
NOTE: Whether any given individual is entitled to a refund depends on a number of different factors, and no one should presume that they are so entitled simply because they see that others are. Each person should educate himself or herself about the particulars of the law, and make his or her own determination in this regard.
To get on the Lost Horizons mailing list, send an email to SubscribeMe 'at' losthorizons.com with your name in the message field.
See what readers have to say about 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America'
The First Complete "Income" Tax-Related Refund (Social Security, Medicare And All) Ever Received
An "Income" Tax Subject Site Map
A Few Words About Tax "Reform"
Click Here to Crack the Code
NOTE: The documents displayed on this and any linked pages, and any associated comments, are posted with the permission and cooperation of the upstanding Americans with whom they are concerned.
When a return is posted in connection with any refund or other responsive document, it is complete-- that is, what is posted is EVERYTHING filed as a return in connection with that refund or document, unless otherwise indicated.