Home -- Site Map -- Search

 

 

Readers of 'Cracking the Code- The Fascinating Truth About Taxation In America' have taken control of their own resources, in accordance with, and respect for, the law. A few of these good American men and women are generous enough to share their victories in upholding the law, for the edification and inspiration of everyone. At the moment the shared refund checks, closing notices, and so forth total

DON'T YOU NEED TO KNOW THE TRUTH, TOO??!!

 

The liberating truth about the "income" tax is turning those who would evade it

EVERY WHICH WAY BUT LOOSE

 

Intro

(Or click here to go straight to the new episode)

 

DO YOU REMEMBER those old sci-fi movies (and numerous 'Lost in Space' and 'Star Trek' episodes) in which an evil robot or a computer collapses into terminal dysfunction after being presented with data that "does not compute"?  The machine would flail about dangerously for a bit (or smoke and shake, and threaten to explode) before finally going limp, silent and harmless.

"LOOK OUT, DOCTOR SMITH!!  DANGER!!  WARNING!!"

 

Some CtC Warriors are being drafted to play the part of the intrepid heroes of these space operas lately, with federal and state "income" tax agencies in the role of the neurotic robot:

 

Since August of 2003, when the revelations of CtC were first published, the IRS has been engaged in a desperate struggle to regain its hold of fear and confusion over those now equipped with an understanding of the long-hidden secrets of the "income" tax, and to stop that understanding from spreading.  We have seen, for instance:

  • a carefully inaccurate allusion to a typical CtC-educated filing sit as #1 on the IRS "Dirty Dozen" list for a year (then quietly get relocated to #5 and then #7 as CtC-educated filings merely increased, and continued to prevail, making the misdirection of the listing too obvious for the agency's comfort);

  • Mis-directional ploys such as the "Questionnaire" discussed here;

  • a multitude of constantly tweaked agency "FAQ" and "Truth About Frivolous Argument" publications seeking to instill doubts about what is taught about the law in CtC in the minds of careless readers, worthy of attention only in order to enjoy the agency's entertaining efforts to imply what it cannot simply declare, but wishes a naive reader to take from the reading.

We have also seen a series of transformations in the means by which the occasional loose-cannon IRS staffer attempts to persuade a CtC-educated filer to stand down.

 

For a while, fairly brazen declarations that a filing meets the statutory definition of a "frivolous return" was the popular approach.  Brazen or not, of course, these notices were always mere exercises in intimidation, which careful analysis readily revealed to be fallacious.

 

Everyone must come to his or her own conclusions, but consider: The notices strive hard to give the impression that the tax agency can unilaterally disregard the target's filing, and can tack on a penalty as well.  BUT they say that the agency will generously refrain from imposing the penalty, if only the target withdraws the original filed testimony and replaces it with what the agency wants attested-to (which, remember, the target is simultaneously being told would be legally meaningless, because the agency can unilaterally disregard that original testimony at will...).

 

What is being implied is that, either way, the amount of tax owed is going to end up being whatever the agency dictates-- the filer's return notwithstanding.  The only optional element is the additional penalty, which the agency is offering to forego out of the goodness of its heart.

 

Well, if this is true..., WHY SEND THIS "LETTER" AT ALL?  If the agency has the power to unilaterally make these decisions, there is absolutely no point to asking the target to do anything!

 

If the agency (or its client) has the power it is suggesting, its correspondent would simply get a notice along the following lines: "Dear Mr. XXX: We have calculated your tax liability for 200X, and converted $XXX of your withheld property in escrow to our ownership.  An invoice for the outstanding balance [if any] is attached.  Your filed return was frivolous, and provided us with the authority to add a $XXX penalty to your tax liability.  We have [added or foregone] this penalty." 

 

After all, if the agency has the unilateral authority it is attempting to suggest that it does, why would it care whether another return was filed?  (Readers of 'Cracking the Code...' will know the answer to that, of course.)

 

Instead, the agency DOES make this "threatening" request; and/or "proposes" calculated liabilities to which it asks its target's agreement in order to have effect (see examples of this here).  Sometimes it begins sending endless "levy notices" to the unbending filer (which notices, insofar as they concern years when only accurate, educated returns have been filed, only allege liability for a penalty, and not for any tax related to the year in question-- even when the target has received a complete refund of every penny withheld or paid-in in connection with that year...).  The sum of all of this is, of course, that the agency DOESN'T have the unilateral authority which it suggests that it does, and where accurate, educated filings are concerned, its "frivolous letters" are just exactly that: frivolous letters.

 

"Tax liability is a condition precedent to the demand. Merely demanding payment, even repeatedly, does not cause liability.  For the condition precedent of liability to be met, there must be a lawful assessment, either a voluntary one by the taxpayer or one procedurally proper by the IRS."

Bothke v. Terry, 713 F. 2d 1405, at 1414 (1983)

 

Nonetheless, as more and more warriors have forcefully pointed out to more and more IRS workers that inappropriately sending such threatening-looking letters cuts very close to the criminal under a variety of federal and state laws, the tax agency has scrambled to adjust.  For one thing, the "frivolous" notices have been carefully and repeatedly modified toward ever-more obvious legal meaninglessness, in order to deflect potential charges of constructive fraud, witness tampering, extortion, etc.

 

At the same time, these legally dicey threatening-sounding notices have been largely replaced by a comical kind of delay tactic, in which the agency sits on a filing in silence, and when contacted with an inquiry to the effect of "Where the h*ll is my property?!", responds with a claim that the agency can't find the filer's return and a request that the offended filer please send a fresh copy, or a series of "We need 45 days to look into the matter-- please be patient-- don't call us, we'll call you..." notices.

 

In this series of articles, we take a close look at many of these gimmicks, ploys and dodges in order to accurately perceive their true character, and take in and appreciate the underlying message, which is that efforts like these are engaged in only when the actor has  no real basis for its actions.

 

Enjoy.

 

***

 

EVERY WHICH WAY BUT LOOSE- XLI

 

CtC Warrior Randy C. has Oregon's robot shouting, "WARNING! WARNING! DANGER, DOCTOR SMITH!!

 

In 2010, Randy filed his testimony with Oregon concerning 2009, showing no "fed-come", and no tax due, while simultaneously rebutting assertions to the contrary made by those who paid him money that year. Around a year later, on March 24, 2011, the Oregon Department of Revenue decided to take a shot at herding Randy back into the barn:

 

 

Randy, an educated, American grown-up, wasn't having any:

 

June 22, 2012

Randy J. Cxxxxxxxxxx

P.O. Box 2160Redmond, Oregon 97756-2160

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE
955 CENTER STREET N.E.
SALEM, OR 97301-2555

RE:
RESPONSE TO DISTRAINT WARRANT AND WRIT OF EXECUTION | REFERENCE NUMBER : R062453221

Via Certified Mail/Return Receipt # 7009 3410 0001 1748 9570

To: Julie, Michael or Connie, (No last names given)

This letter is in response to the above mentioned notice, which is being returned to you unsigned, that I received on 06/22/2012. The Distraint Warrant is not signed under Penalty of Perjury by any Judge supported by Oath or affirmation under the 4th Amendment, nor is there any Affidavit enclosed signed under the Penalty of Perjury, supported by Oath or affirmation, received by me. This action by your agency violates due process under the 5th Amendment. Please find enclosed a “Proof of Claim” request to be answered by an agent in your department. Also be advised that I do not waive any rights in this matter. I do not consent, nor do I recognize your agency's alleged authority over me. In addition, I am not a Foreign Corporation of the State of Oregon. I am also not a Non-Resident Alien or Foreign Person subject to withholding. I also do not consent to the Title of Garnishee. Further, I request the Oath of Office and Bond information as well as the full legal names of Julie, Michael and Connie, the agents in charge of this account. Thank you for kind attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Randy J. Cxxxxxxxx All Rights Reserved

June 22, 2012

Randy J. Cxxxxxxxxx

P.O. Box 2160Redmond, Oregon 97756-2160

OREGON DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE 955 Center Street NE Salem, OR 97301-2555

RE: REQUEST FOR PROOF OF CLAIM Via Certified Mail/Return Receipt # 7009 3410 0001 1748 9570 To: Julie, Michael or Connie, I am in receipt of an unsigned current notice of an alleged tax bill that was generated by someone with

the name Julie, Reference Number: XXX-XX-7503 100 09 12 3, that your department says I owe and is hereby officially disputed. I must request a verifiable proof of claim signed by a live natural person, under penalty of perjury and their full commercial liability. Your proof of claim must contain answers to the questions which are listed below:

 

1.) Am I an  Employee, Official or Agent of the United States, or a State who has taken an Oath?


2.) What is the State of Oregon's definition of income?


3.) Are Oregon's Tax Laws a model based on the Internal Revenue laws under Title 26?


4.) Are Oregon Tax Laws considered “positive law” or “color of law”?


5.) What tax liability do I have?


6.) What constitutes “tax liability”?


7.) What is considered a “taxable event”?


8.) Who originally assessed the liability?


9.) Do I sell alcohol, tobacco, or firearms?


10.) Am I a foreign corporation registered in United States or in the State of Oregon?


11.) Am I a non-resident alien?


12.) Am I a foreign person?

13.) Am I engaged in the conduct of a “Trade or Business” in the United States which “includes the performance of the functions of a public office”?

If you continue your unlawful collection efforts, I will have no other recourse than to file a complaint in Marion County District Court for the following violations:

.                 Obstruction of justice under 18 U.S.C. Chapter 73

.                 Conspiracy against rights under 18 U.S.C. §241

.                 Extortion under 18 U.S.C. §872  .

.                 Wrongful actions of Revenue Officers under 26 U.S.C. §7214

.                 Engaging in monetary transactions derived from unlawful activity under 18 U.S.C. §1957

.                 Mailing threatening communications under 18 U.S.C. §876

.                 False writings and fraud under 18 U.S.C. §1018

.                 Taking of property without due process of law under 26 CFR §601.106(f)(1)

.                 Fraud under 18 U.S.C. §1341

.                 Continuing financial crimes enterprise (RICO) under 18 U.S.C. §225

.                 Treason under Article III, Section 3, Clause 1 of the U.S. Constitution

.                 Breach of fiduciary duty  in violation of 26 CFR 2635.101, Executive order order 12731, and Public Law 96-303

.                 Peonage and obstructing enforcement under Thirteenth Amendment , 18 U.S.C. §1581  and 42 U.S.C.  §1994

Bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. §2113  ( in the case of fraudulent notice of levies)

I would appreciate a reply to this request within thirty (30) days from your receipt of this request. If I do not receive any response within that time frame, I request that the funds unlawfully held for $1,906.00 be returned to me and the account permanently closed. Thank you for your kind attention to this matter.

Sincerely,

Randy J. Cxxxxxxxxx All Rights Reserved

 

On August 21, 2012, Oregon rolled it up and rolled away to look for a softer target:

 

 

 

WAY TO GO, RANDY!

But...

 

Watch out for that robot!  I THINK IT'S GOING TO EXPLODE!!

Isn't it too bad everyone hasn't done like Randy, and read CtC-- the exclusive source of the complete, accurate and liberating truth about the "income" tax?  You can help change that, and thereby help transform America.  Click here to learn how.

 

Is this newsletter of any value to you? If so, please consider a donation to help keep it available.

Donations can be sent to:

Doreen Hendrickson

232 Oriole St.

Commerce Twp., MI  48382

 

To enjoy more episodes in this series, visit the 'Every Which Way But Loose' collection!

Also, see the Victories Highlights page for additional specially-notable CtC-educated victories, and, to enjoy hundreds and hundreds of  straightforward "just-the-check-and-no-hassles" victories enjoyed by the CtC-educated for years now, click on the links below:

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page One

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Two

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Three

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Four

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Five

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Six

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eight

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nine

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Ten

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eleven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twelve

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Thirteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fourteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Fifteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Sixteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Seventeen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Eighteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Nineteen

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Twenty

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyOne

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyTwo

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyThree

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFour

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyFive

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentySix

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentySeven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyEight

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page TwentyNine

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Thirty

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyOne

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyTwo

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyThree

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyFour

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyFive

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtySix

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtySeven

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyEight

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page ThirtyNine

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page Forty

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page FortyOne

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page FortyTwo

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page FortyThree

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page FortyFour

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page FortyFive

 

More Victories For The Rule Of Law- Page FortySix

 

Are You Ready For More Power?

 

   

"Peter Hendrickson has done it again!  'Upholding The Law' does for individual liberties what 'Cracking the Code' did for tax law compliance: exposes the reader to the unalienable truth!"

-Jesse Herron, Bill Of Rights Press, Fort Collins, Colorado

 

AND DON'T MISS

NEW

from Pete Hendrickson,

the man who Cracked the Code of the United States "income" tax;

 

became the first American in history to recover EVERYTHING withheld from him, Social Security and Medicare "contributions" included;

 

and has ever since been the target of unrelenting assaults by a government willing to do just about anything to thwart the spread of the truth!!

 

In this new volume, you'll learn about:

 

  • The in-depth, real story behind the Sixteenth Amendment;

  • A simple little model of just how the "income" tax works;

  • Cognitive stumbling blocks exploited by tax agencies against liberation-seeking Americans;

  • The disturbing relationship between the "income" tax and the Federal Reserve;

  • Why tax reform ideas like the "Fair Tax" are not only unnecessary, but completely counter-productive and even dangerous;

  • Why the "income" tax is what it is, and has to be;

  • The truth about common myths and misunderstandings within the "tax honesty" movement;

  • How to think clearly about the tax, the law in general, and the voracious state;

Plus,

  • A sordid little passport application scam revealed;

  • How to know if you're in denial about the current crisis in America;

  • Whether the Constitution is going to save you, or is it the other way around?

  • The truth about paper "money; government schools; the Second Amendment...

...and much, much more!